Literature DB >> 18204911

Evaluating the applicability of regulatory leaching tests for assessing lead leachability in contaminated shooting range soils.

Xinde Cao1, Dimitris Dermatas.   

Abstract

The toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) is the current US-EPA standard protocol to evaluate metal leachability in wastes and contaminated soils. However, application of TCLP to assess lead (Pb) leachability from contaminated shooting range soils may be questionable. This study determined Pb leachability in the range soils using TCLP and another US-EPA regulatory leaching method, synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP). Possible mechanisms that are responsible for Pb leaching in each leaching protocol were elucidated via X-ray diffraction (XRD). Soil samples were collected from the backstop berms at four shooting ranges, with Pb concentrations ranging from 5,000 to 60,600 mg kg(-1) soil. Lead concentrations in the TCLP leachates were from 3 to 350 mg l(-1), with all but one soil exceeding the USEPA non-hazardous waste disposal limit of 5 mg l(-1). However, continued dissolution of metallic Pb particles from spent Pb bullets and its re-precipitation as cerussite (PbCO(3)) prevented the TCLP extraction from reaching equilibrium at the end of the standard leaching period (18 h). Thus, the standard one-point TCLP test would either over- or under-estimate Pb leachability in shooting range soils. Lead concentration in the SPLP leachates ranged from 0.021 to 2.6 mg l(-1), with all soils above the USEPA regulatory limit of 0.015 mg l(-1). In contrast to TCLP, SPLP leaching had reached equilibrium, with regard to both pH and Pb concentrations, within the standard 18 h leaching period, and the analytical SPLP results were in good agreement with those derived from modeling. Thus, we concluded that SPLP is a more appropriate alternative than TCLP for assessing lead leachability in range soils.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18204911     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-0110-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  10 in total

1.  The distribution of outdoor shooting ranges in Ontario and the potential for lead pollution of soil and water.

Authors:  Colin T R Darling; Vernon G Thomas
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  X-ray absorption spectroscopic evidence for the formation of Pb(II) inner-sphere adsorption complexes and precipitates at the calcite-water interface.

Authors:  Ashaki A Rouff; Evert J Elzinga; Richard J Reeder; Nicholas S Fisher
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Contaminant bioavailability in soils, sediments, and aquatic environments.

Authors:  S J Traina; V Laperche
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Weathering of lead bullets and their environmental effects at outdoor shooting ranges.

Authors:  Xinde Cao; Lena Q Ma; Ming Chen; Donald W Hardison; Willie G Harris
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.751

5.  Spatial distribution and speciation of lead around corroding bullets in a shooting range soil studied by micro-X-ray fluorescence and absorption spectroscopy.

Authors:  Delphine Vantelon; Antonio Lanzirotti; Andreas C Scheinost; Ruben Kretzschmar
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Lead transformation and distribution in the soils of shooting ranges in Florida, USA.

Authors:  Xinde Cao; Lena Q Ma; Ming Chen; Donald W Hardison; Willie G Harris
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Arsenic and heavy metal mobility in iron oxide-amended contaminated soils as evaluated by short- and long-term leaching tests.

Authors:  William Hartley; Robert Edwards; Nicholas W Lepp
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Lead contamination in shooting range soils from abrasion of lead bullets and subsequent weathering.

Authors:  Donald W Hardison; Lena Q Ma; Thomas Luongo; Willie G Harris
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  TCLP underestimates leaching of arsenic from solid residuals under landfill conditions.

Authors:  Amlan Ghosh; Muhammed Mukiibi; Wendell Ela
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Comparison between acetic acid and landfill leachates for the leaching of Pb(II), Cd(II), As(V), and Cr(VI) from cementitious wastes.

Authors:  Cheryl E Halim; Jason A Scott; Helena Natawardaya; Rose Amal; Donia Beydoun; Gary Low
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  The role of biochar, natural iron oxides, and nanomaterials as soil amendments for immobilizing metals in shooting range soil.

Authors:  Anushka Upamali Rajapaksha; Mahtab Ahmad; Meththika Vithanage; Kwon-Rae Kim; Jun Young Chang; Sang Soo Lee; Yong Sik Ok
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Release of nutrients and heavy metals from biochar-amended soil under environmentally relevant conditions.

Authors:  Yinghao Zhao; Ling Zhao; Yanyan Mei; Feiyue Li; Xinde Cao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Mobility of Pb, Cu, and Zn in the phosphorus-amended contaminated soils under simulated landfill and rainfall conditions.

Authors:  Xinde Cao; Yuan Liang; Ling Zhao; Huangying Le
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 4.223

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.