Literature DB >> 18204895

Is face-only photographic view enough for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment?

Maria João Cardoso1, André Magalhães, Teresa Almeida, Susy Costa, Conny Vrieling, David Christie, Jørgen Johansen, Jaime S Cardoso.   

Abstract

The breast cancer conservative treatment. cosmetic results (BCCT.core) is a new software tool created for the automatic and objective evaluation of the aesthetic result of BCCT. It makes use of a face-only photographic view of each patient and might thus have been considered insufficient for an accurate evaluation, as others have used multiple views of each patient. The purpose of this work is to compare the performance of the BCCT.core (using face-only views) with a subjective expert analysis using both the face-only and four-view assessment. Photographs in four-views of 150 patients, were evaluated by a panel of experts and a consensus classification was obtained. The agreement between the consensus and the BCCT.core (face-only view) was calculated using the kappa (k) and weighted kappa (wk) statistics. Face-only views, of the same 150 patients, were subsequently sorted out in a different order and sent for individual evaluation by three specialists from the previous panel of experts. The individual agreement between the face-only view and the four-view evaluation by each of the three experts and the consensus was calculated using the same methods. Obtained results were compared to the BCCT.core performance. The software obtained a moderate agreement with the consensus (k = 0.57; wk = 0.68). The highest value of agreement, from the three experts, between the four-view evaluation and the consensus was identical to the software agreement (k = 0.55; wk = 0.67). In the face-only view experiment, the highest value of agreement between the experts and the consensus was only fair (k = 0.37; wk = 0.54). Performance of the software was thus considered equal to that obtained by experts using a four-view evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18204895     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-9896-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of breast cosmetic changes with a computer-software; the breast cancer conservative treatment cosmetic results (BCCT. core) in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery-supplementary analysis of multicenter single-arm confirmatory trial: JCOG0906.

Authors:  Miwako Nozaki; Yoshikazu Kagami; Mitsuhiro Takahashi; Ryunosuke Machida; Yuta Sekino; Taro Shibata; Yoshinori Ito; Yasumasa Nishimura; Teruki Teshima; Hiroki Ushijima; Yasushi Nagata; Yasuo Matsumoto; Tetsuo Akimoto; Kana Takahashi; Shigeyuki Murayama; Takashi Uno; Kayoko Tsujino; Yasushi Hamamoto; Keiichi Nakagawa; Takeshi Kodaira; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Cosmetic evaluation methods adapted to asian patients after breast-conserving surgery and examination of the necessarily elements for cosmetic evaluation.

Authors:  Yuki Nohara; Noriko Hanamura; Hisamitsu Zaha; Hiroko Kimura; Yumi Kashikura; Takashi Nakamura; Aya Noro; Nao Imai; Mai Shibusawa; Tomoko Ogawa
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.588

3.  Cosmetic outcome as rated by patients, doctors, nurses and BCCT.core software assessed over 5 years in a subset of patients in the TARGIT-A Trial.

Authors:  Tammy Corica; Anna K Nowak; Christobel M Saunders; Max K Bulsara; Mandy Taylor; Norman R Williams; Mohammed Keshtgar; David J Joseph; Jayant S Vaidya
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  A prospective comparison of subjective and objective assessments of cosmetic outcomes following breast brachytherapy.

Authors:  Tabassum Wadasadawala; Shwetabh Sinha; Shalini Verma; Vani Parmar; Sadhana Kannan; Rima Pathak; Rajiv Sarin; Mithila Gaikar
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2019-06-28

5.  Long-term results of oncoplastic breast surgery with latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction: a pilot study of the objective cosmetic results and patient reported outcome.

Authors:  Kyeong-Deok Kim; Zisun Kim; Jung Cheol Kuk; Jaehong Jeong; Kyu Sung Choi; Sung Mo Hur; Gui Ae Jeong; Jun Chul Chung; Gyu Seok Cho; Eung Jin Shin; Hyung Chul Kim; Sang-Gue Kang; Min Hyuk Lee; Cheol Wan Lim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 1.859

6.  An Aesthetic Factor Priority List of the Female Breast in Scandinavian Subjects.

Authors:  Lars Johan Sandberg; Kim A Tønseth; Kristine Kloster-Jensen; Jun Liu; Charee Robe; Gregory Reece; Elisabeth H Hansen; Karin Berntsen; Martin Halle; Åsa Edsander-Nord; Anna Höckerstedt; Susanna Kauhanen; Christian Sneistrup; Tyge Tindholdt; Hans Petter Gullestad; Gudjon Leifur Gunnarsson; Erik Berg; Jesse Creed Selber
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-04-11

7.  3-Dimensional objective aesthetic evaluation to replace panel assessment after breast-conserving treatment.

Authors:  Amy R Godden; Rachel L O'Connell; Peter A Barry; Katherine C D Krupa; Lisa M Wolf; Kabir Mohammed; Anna M Kirby; Jennifer E Rusby
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.239

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.