Literature DB >> 18204403

Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in the general population: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders.

Linda J Carroll1, Sheilah Hogg-Johnson, Gabrielle van der Velde, Scott Haldeman, Lena W Holm, Eugene J Carragee, Eric L Hurwitz, Pierre Côté, Margareta Nordin, Paul M Peloso, Jaime Guzman, J David Cassidy.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Best evidence synthesis.
OBJECTIVE: To undertake a best evidence synthesis on course and prognosis of neck pain and its associated disorders in the general population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Knowing the course of neck pain guides expectations for recovery. Identifying prognostic factors assists in planning public policies, formulating interventions, and promoting lifestyle changes to decrease the burden of neck pain.
METHODS: The Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated Disorders (Neck Pain Task Force) conducted a critical review of literature published between 1980 and 2006 to assemble the best evidence on neck pain. Findings from studies meeting criteria for scientific validity were abstracted into evidence tables and included in a best evidence synthesis.
RESULTS: We found 226 articles on the course and prognostic factors in neck pain and its associated disorders. After critical review, 70 (31%) of these were accepted on scientific merit. Six studies related to course and 7 to prognostic factors in the general population. Between half and three quarters of persons in these populations with current neck pain will report neck pain again 1 to 5 years later. Younger age predicted better outcome. General exercise was unassociated with outcome, although regular bicycling predicted poor outcome in 1 study. Psychosocial factors, including psychologic health, coping patterns, and need to socialize, were the strongest prognostic factors. Several potential prognostic factors have not been well studied, including degenerative changes, genetic factors, and compensation policies.
CONCLUSION: The Neck Pain Task Force undertook a best evidence synthesis to establish a baseline of the current best evidence on the course and prognosis for this symptom. General exercise was not prognostic of better outcome; however, several psychosocial factors were prognostic of outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18204403     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816445be

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  77 in total

1.  Neck pain patients' preference scores for their current health.

Authors:  Gabrielle van der Velde; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Pierre Côté; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Eric L Hurwitz; Murray Krahn
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Mechanical pain sensitivity and the severity of chronic neck pain and disability are not modulated across the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Jaclyn E Balter; Jennifer L Molner; Wendy M Kohrt; Katrina S Maluf
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Validation of the French version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire.

Authors:  Johanne Martel; Claude Dugas; D Lafond; M Descarreaux
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2009

4.  Do physical activity level and body mass index predict recovery from persistent neck pain in men and women of working age? A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  E Rasmussen-Barr; T Bohman; J Hallqvist; L W Holm; E Skillgate
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  "I know it's changed": a mixed-methods study of the meaning of Global Perceived Effect in chronic neck pain patients.

Authors:  Roni Evans; Gert Bronfort; Michele Maiers; Craig Schulz; Jan Hartvigsen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Conservative management of idiopathic anterior atlantoaxial subluxation without neurological deficits in an 83-year-old female: A case report.

Authors:  Andrée-Anne Marchand; Jessica J Wong
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-03

7.  Age-related cutoffs for cervical movement behaviour to distinguish chronic idiopathic neck pain patients from unimpaired subjects.

Authors:  Daniel Niederer; Lutz Vogt; Jan Wilke; Marcus Rickert; Winfried Banzer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The experience and management of neck pain in general practice: the patients' perspective.

Authors:  Martin Scherer; Helene Schaefer; Eva Blozik; Jean-François Chenot; Wolfgang Himmel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Neck/shoulder pain in adolescents is not related to the level or nature of self-reported physical activity or type of sedentary activity in an Australian pregnancy cohort.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Leon M Straker; Natasha L Bear; Anne J Smith
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Analyzing musculoskeletal neck pain, measured as present pain and periods of pain, with three different regression models: a cohort study.

Authors:  Anna Grimby-Ekman; Eva M Andersson; Mats Hagberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.