Literature DB >> 18204233

Cadaveric fascia lata versus intravaginal slingplasty for the pubovaginal sling: surgical outcome, overall success and patient satisfaction rates.

Erem Kaan Basok1, Asif Yildirim, Necmettin Atsu, Adnan Basaran, Resit Tokuc.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A wide variety of surgical procedures has been used to treat female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The purpose of this study was to compare cadaveric fascia lata (CFL) sling with intravaginal slingplasty (IVS) in the surgical treatment of SUI.
METHODS: One hundred and thirty-nine women with SUI were randomly assigned to either CFL sling (n = 67) or IVS (n = 72). Concomitant urinary urge incontinence was present in 49 patients (73%) in the CFL sling and 44 patients (61%) in the IVS group. Daily mean pad usage was 4.1 +/- 3.5 in the CFL sling and 2.9 +/- 1.7 in the IVS group. The objective cure rate was evaluated by the pad test, and patient satisfaction rate was assessed by a subjective questionnaire.
RESULTS: The surgical results of both procedures with a follow-up 12 months were documented. The overall success rate was 79% in the CFL sling and 70.8% in the IVS (p = 0.261). In contrast patient satisfaction rates were 82 and 87.5%, respectively (p = 0.210). Comparison of the CFL sling with IVS showed persistent urinary urge incontinence in 67 and 25% (p = 0.0001) and de novo urinary urge incontinence in 22 and 6.9%, respectively (p = 0.009). The groups did not differ significantly with respect to intraoperative and postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no statistical difference in the overall success, satisfaction and complication rates in either group. In our series, both procedures were found to be effective, durable and significantly improved quality of life in patients with SUI but long-term results are awaited. (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18204233     DOI: 10.1159/000111729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  4 in total

Review 1.  Outcome measures for stress urinary incontinence treatment: can we minimally agree?

Authors:  Véronique Phé; Philippe Zimmern; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Haroon Rehman; Carlos A Bezerra; Homero Bruschini; June D Cody; Patricia Aluko
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-26

3.  Effectiveness of mesh compared with nonmesh sling surgery in Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Anne M Suskind; J Quentin Clemens; Rodney L Dunn; Yun Zhang; John T Stoffel; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Lucky Saraswat; Haroon Rehman; Muhammad Imran Omar; June D Cody; Patricia Aluko; Cathryn Ma Glazener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.