Literature DB >> 18203157

Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of craniofacial shape in the unaffected relatives of individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts: a possible marker for genetic susceptibility.

Seth M Weinberg1, Katherine Neiswanger, Joan T Richtsmeier, Brion S Maher, Mark P Mooney, Michael I Siegel, Mary L Marazita.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have described altered patterns of craniofacial form in the unaffected relatives of individuals with nonsyndromic clefts. Unfortunately, results from such studies have been highly variable and have failed to provide a reliable method for differentiating "at-risk" relatives from controls. In the present study, we compared craniofacial shape between a sample of unaffected relatives (33 females; 14 males) from cleft multiplex families and an equal number of age/sex/ethnicity-matched controls. Sixteen x,y,z facial landmark coordinates derived from 3D photogrammetry were analyzed via Euclidean Distance Matrix Analysis, while 14 additional linear distances were analyzed via t tests. A subset of variables was then entered into a discriminant function analysis (DFA). Compared to controls, female unaffected relatives demonstrated increased upper facial width, midface reduction and lateral displacement of the alar cartilage. DFA correctly classified 70% of female unaffected relatives and 73% of female controls. Male unaffected relatives demonstrated increased upper facial and cranial base width, increased lower facial height and decreased upper facial height compared with controls. DFA correctly classified 86% of male unaffected relatives and 93% of male controls. In both sexes, upper facial width contributed most to group discrimination. Following DFA, unaffected relatives were assigned to risk/liability classes based on the degree of phenotypic divergence from controls. Results indicate that craniofacial shape differences characterizing unaffected relatives are partly sex-specific and are in broad agreement with previous reports. These findings further suggest that a quantitative assessment of the craniofacial phenotype may allow for the identification of susceptible individuals within nonsyndromic cleft families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18203157     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  22 in total

1.  Facial asymmetry in young healthy subjects evaluated by statistical shape analysis.

Authors:  Ilker Ercan; Senem Turan Ozdemir; Abdullah Etoz; Deniz Sigirli; R Shane Tubbs; Marios Loukas; Ibrahim Guney
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Genetics of cleft lip and cleft palate.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Leslie; Mary L Marazita
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 3.  Genetics of nonsyndromic orofacial clefts.

Authors:  Fedik Rahimov; Astanand Jugessur; Jeffrey C Murray
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2011-05-05

Review 4.  Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences.

Authors:  Michael J Dixon; Mary L Marazita; Terri H Beaty; Jeffrey C Murray
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  The evolution of human genetic studies of cleft lip and cleft palate.

Authors:  Mary L Marazita
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 8.929

6.  Genetic determination of human facial morphology: links between cleft-lips and normal variation.

Authors:  Stefan Boehringer; Fedde van der Lijn; Fan Liu; Manuel Günther; Stella Sinigerova; Stefanie Nowak; Kerstin U Ludwig; Ruth Herberz; Stefan Klein; Albert Hofman; Andre G Uitterlinden; Wiro J Niessen; Monique M B Breteler; Aad van der Lugt; Rolf P Würtz; Markus M Nöthen; Bernhard Horsthemke; Dagmar Wieczorek; Elisabeth Mangold; Manfred Kayser
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of brain shape in nonsyndromic orofacial clefting.

Authors:  Seth M Weinberg; Nancy C Andreasen; Peg Nopoulos
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Face shape of unaffected parents with cleft affected offspring: combining three-dimensional surface imaging and geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  S M Weinberg; S D Naidoo; K M Bardi; C A Brandon; K Neiswanger; J M Resick; R A Martin; M L Marazita
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Testing the face shape hypothesis in twins discordant for nonsyndromic orofacial clefting.

Authors:  Jasmien Roosenboom; Karlijne Indencleef; Greet Hens; Hilde Peeters; Kaare Christensen; Mary L Marazita; Peter Claes; Elizabeth J Leslie; Seth M Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Exploratory genotype-phenotype correlations of facial form and asymmetry in unaffected relatives of children with non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate.

Authors:  Steven F Miller; Seth M Weinberg; Nichole L Nidey; David K Defay; Mary L Marazita; George L Wehby; Lina M Moreno Uribe
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.