Literature DB >> 18202983

Developing a tool to measure contributions to medication-related processes in family practice.

Barbara Farrell1, Kevin Pottie, Kirsten Woodend, Vivian Hua Yao, Natalie Kennie, Connie Sellors, Carmel Martin, Lisa Dolovich.   

Abstract

Successful team care requires a shared understanding of roles and expertise. This paper describes the development and preliminary exploration of the psychometric properties of a tool designed to measure contributions to family practice medication-related processes. Our team identified medication-related processes commonly occurring in family practice. We assessed clinical appropriateness using a sensibility questionnaire and pilot-tested with 11 pharmacists, nurses and physicians. We performed a simulated exercise to group the processes and assessed the internal consistency of the groupings using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. We examined test-retest reliability using intra-class coefficient (ICC). Following three revisions, the final Medication Use Processes Matrix (MUPM) included 22 medication-related processes and scale descriptors reflecting contribution to each process. Mean sensibility ratings were high for each component. We developed five theoretical groupings (diagnosis & prescribing, monitoring, administrative/documentation, education, medication review) and found their overall internal consistency was good (alpha > 0.80). The test-retest reliability was strong (ICC > 0.80). Preliminary validation showed significant differences in how health professionals view interprofessional contributions toward medication-related processes. Interprofessional care requires a negotiated understanding of processes and contributions. The MUPM provides an explicit description of medication-related processes in primary care, measures perceived contributions and emerges as a new tool to measure collaborative care in family practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18202983     DOI: 10.1080/13561820701828845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  7 in total

1.  Guidelines for pharmacists integrating into primary care teams.

Authors:  Derek Jorgenson; Dan Dalton; Barbara Farrell; Ross T Tsuyuki; Lisa Dolovich
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2013-11

2.  Multidisciplinary members' perspectives on a pharmacist joining a rheumatology practice team.

Authors:  Kerry Wilbur; Jason Kur
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2015-07

3.  Opinions and preferences of British Columbia pharmacists and physicians on medication management services.

Authors:  Nicole W Tsao; Amir Khakban; Louise Gastonguay; Zafar Zafari; Larry D Lynd; Carlo A Marra
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2016-10-12

Review 4.  A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools Measuring Interprofessional Education Outcomes Relevant to Pharmacy Education.

Authors:  Sarah Shrader; Michelle Z Farland; Jennifer Danielson; Brigitte Sicat; Elena M Umland
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Pilot study of a multidisciplinary gout patient education and monitoring program.

Authors:  Theodore R Fields; Adam Rifaat; Arthur M F Yee; Dalit Ashany; Katherine Kim; Matthew Tobin; Nicole Oliva; Kara Fields; Monica Richey; Shanthini Kasturi; Adena Batterman
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Integrating pharmacists into family practice teams: physicians' perspectives on collaborative care.

Authors:  Kevin Pottie; Barbara Farrell; Susan Haydt; Lisa Dolovich; Connie Sellors; Natalie Kennie; William Hogg; Carmel M Martin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Perceptions of clinical pharmacy specialists' contributions in mental health clinical teams.

Authors:  Chris Gillespie; Felicia Kleinberg; Anna Zogas; Anthony Morreale; Heather Ourth; Michael Tran; Tera Moore; Donald Miller; Megan McCullough
Journal:  Ment Health Clin       Date:  2022-01-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.