Literature DB >> 1820276

The genetic toxicity database of the National Toxicology Program: evaluation of the relationships between genetic toxicity and carcinogenicity.

R W Tennant1.   

Abstract

The database of the U.S. National Toxicology Program has been developed over approximately two decades, principally focused on substances evaluated for carcinogenicity in rodent bioassays. These assays generally provide data on the relative toxicity and carcinogenicity of chemicals based upon discrete subchronic (13 week) and chronic (104 week) exposures. A major value of these data are that the assay protocols, rodent strains, and technical methodologies have been generally consistent, thus permitting comparisons between assays and chemicals. The genotoxicity data for many of the same chemicals have been developed also using standardized biological systems and protocols. Data for assays including mutagenicity in Salmonella and mouse lymphoma cells, chromosomal aberrations, and sister chromatid exchange in Chinese hamster ovary cells, transformation of Balb/c 3T3 cells, and in vivo cytogenetic effects in rodents have been compiled for many chemicals. The results of all of these assays provide a substantial database for evaluating chemical effects and for defining the complex relationships between mutagenicity and carcinogenicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1820276      PMCID: PMC1568246          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.919647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  38 in total

1.  Classification according to chemical structure, mutagenicity to Salmonella and level of carcinogenicity of a further 42 chemicals tested for carcinogenicity by the U.S. National Toxicology Program.

Authors:  J Ashby; R W Tennant; E Zeiger; S Stasiewicz
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  Prediction of the outcome of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays currently being conducted on 44 chemicals by the National Toxicology Program.

Authors:  R W Tennant; J Spalding; S Stasiewicz; J Ashby
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Chemical mutagenesis testing in Drosophila. IV. Results of 45 coded compounds tested for the National Toxicology Program.

Authors:  J S Yoon; J M Mason; R Valencia; R C Woodruff; S Zimmering
Journal:  Environ Mutagen       Date:  1985

4.  Chemical mutagenesis testing in Drosophila. II. Results of 20 coded compounds tested for the National Toxicology Program.

Authors:  S Zimmering; J M Mason; R Valencia; R C Woodruff
Journal:  Environ Mutagen       Date:  1985

5.  Definitive relationships among chemical structure, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity for 301 chemicals tested by the U.S. NTP.

Authors:  J Ashby; R W Tennant
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Chemical mutagenesis testing in Drosophila. VI. Interlaboratory comparison of mutagenicity tests after treatment of larvae.

Authors:  R Valencia; J M Mason; S Zimmering
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Mutagenicity testing of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and related chemicals in Salmonella.

Authors:  E Zeiger; S Haworth; K Mortelmans; W Speck
Journal:  Environ Mutagen       Date:  1985

8.  Comparative cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow damage induced in male B6C3F1 mice by multiple exposures to gaseous 1,3-butadiene.

Authors:  R R Tice; R Boucher; C A Luke; M D Shelby
Journal:  Environ Mutagen       Date:  1987

9.  Chemical mutagenesis testing in Drosophila. V. Results of 53 coded compounds tested for the National Toxicology Program.

Authors:  R C Woodruff; J M Mason; R Valencia; S Zimmering
Journal:  Environ Mutagen       Date:  1985

10.  Chemical mutagenesis testing in Drosophila. III. Results of 48 coded compounds tested for the National Toxicology Program.

Authors:  R Valencia; J M Mason; R C Woodruff; S Zimmering
Journal:  Environ Mutagen       Date:  1985
View more
  6 in total

1.  Integrated in silico approaches for the prediction of Ames test mutagenicity.

Authors:  Sandeep Modi; Jin Li; Sophie Malcomber; Claire Moore; Andrew Scott; Andrew White; Paul Carmichael
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  p53 induction as a genotoxic test for twenty-five chemicals undergoing in vivo carcinogenicity testing.

Authors:  P J Duerksen-Hughes; J Yang; O Ozcan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 3.  Genetic toxicology: current status of methods of carcinogen identification.

Authors:  R W Tennant; E Zeiger
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Predicting Aromatic Amine Mutagenicity with Confidence: A Case Study Using Conformal Prediction.

Authors:  Ulf Norinder; Glenn Myatt; Ernst Ahlberg
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2018-08-29

5.  Descriptor Free QSAR Modeling Using Deep Learning With Long Short-Term Memory Neural Networks.

Authors:  Suman K Chakravarti; Sai Radha Mani Alla
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2019-09-06

6.  Long-term chemical carcinogenesis experiments for identifying potential human cancer hazards: collective database of the National Cancer Institute and National Toxicology Program (1976-1991).

Authors:  J Huff; J Haseman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.