Literature DB >> 18202566

Determinants of 800-m and 1500-m running performance using allometric models.

Stephen A Ingham1, Gregory P Whyte, Charles Pedlar, David M Bailey, Natalie Dunman, Alan M Nevill.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the optimal aerobic determinants of elite, middle-distance running (MDR) performance, using proportional allometric models.
METHODS: Sixty-two national and international male and female 800-m and 1500-m runners undertook an incremental exercise test to volitional exhaustion. Mean submaximal running economy (ECON), speed at lactate threshold (speedLT), maximum oxygen uptake (.VO(2max)), and speed associated with .VO(2max) (speed.VO(2max)) were paired with best performance times recorded within 30 d. The data were analyzed using a proportional power-function ANCOVA model.
RESULTS: The analysis identified significant differences in running speeds with main effects for sex and distance, with .VO(2max) and ECON as the covariate predictors (P < 0.0001). The results suggest a proportional curvilinear association between running speed and the ratio (.VO(2max).ECON(-0.71))(0.35) explaining 95.9% of the variance in performance. The model was cross-validated with a further group of highly trained MDR, demonstrating strong agreement (95% limits, 0.05 +/- 0.29 m.s(-1)) between predicted and actual performance speeds (R(2) = 93.6%). The model indicates that for a male 1500-m runner with a .VO(2max) of 3.81 L.min(-1) and ECON of 15 L.km(-1) to improve from 250 to 240 s, it would require a change in .VO(2max) from 3.81 to 4.28 L.min(-1), an increase of Delta0.47 L.min(-1). However, improving by the same margin of 10 s from 225 to 215 s would require a much greater increase in .VO(2max), from 5.14 to 5.85 L.min(-1), an increase of Delta0.71 L.min(-1) (where ECON remains constant).
CONCLUSION: A proportional curvilinear ratio of .VO(2max) divided by ECON explains 95.9% of the variance in MDR performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18202566     DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a83dc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  23 in total

1.  Maximal Sprint Speed and the Anaerobic Speed Reserve Domain: The Untapped Tools that Differentiate the World's Best Male 800 m Runners.

Authors:  Gareth N Sandford; Andrew E Kilding; Angus Ross; Paul B Laursen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Factors affecting the energy cost of level running at submaximal speed.

Authors:  Jean-René Lacour; Muriel Bourdin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Oxygen uptake at different intensities and sub-techniques predicts sprint performance in elite male cross-country skiers.

Authors:  Magnus Carlsson; Tomas Carlsson; Magnus Knutsson; Christer Malm; Michail Tonkonogi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  The between and within day variation in gross efficiency.

Authors:  Dionne A Noordhof; Jos J de Koning; Teun van Erp; Bart van Keimpema; Daan de Ridder; Ruby Otter; Carl Foster
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Do Sex Differences in Physiology Confer a Female Advantage in Ultra-Endurance Sport?

Authors:  Nicholas B Tiller; Kirsty J Elliott-Sale; Beat Knechtle; Patrick B Wilson; Justin D Roberts; Guillaume Y Millet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Determinants of performance in 1,500-m runners.

Authors:  Alessandra Ferri; Saverio Adamo; Antonio La Torre; Mauro Marzorati; David J Bishop; Giuseppe Miserocchi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Anaerobic Speed/Power Reserve and Sport Performance: Scientific Basis, Current Applications and Future Directions.

Authors:  Gareth N Sandford; Paul B Laursen; Martin Buchheit
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 11.928

Review 8.  Erythropoietin doping in cycling: lack of evidence for efficacy and a negative risk-benefit.

Authors:  Jules A A C Heuberger; Joost M Cohen Tervaert; Femke M L Schepers; Adriaan D B Vliegenthart; Joris I Rotmans; Johannes M A Daniels; Jacobus Burggraaf; Adam F Cohen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Sex-based limits to running speed in the human, horse and dog: The role of sexual dimorphisms.

Authors:  Jonathon W Senefeld; John R A Shepherd; Sarah E Baker; Michael J Joyner
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Energy cost of running and Achilles tendon stiffness in man and woman trained runners.

Authors:  Jared R Fletcher; Ted R Pfister; Brian R Macintosh
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2013-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.