Literature DB >> 18202164

Population based epidemiology and prognosis of mesothelioma in Leeds, UK.

A Chapman1, S Mulrennan, B Ladd, M F Muers.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Malignant mesothelioma is a fatal neoplasm, which is rapidly increasing in incidence throughout Western Europe. To date there have been no studies reporting on the natural history and interventional practices on a comprehensive unselected population, as opposed to reports from referral institutions or compensation claimants. We present a population based study capturing data on all patients with mesothelioma presenting within a defined geographical area over a 4 year period in the UK.
METHOD: Data of all cases occurring in Leeds with a population of 750 000 were collected retrospectively from 2002 to 2003 and prospectively from 2004 to 2005. All patients' hospital records and the Trust histology database were reviewed, as well as coroner's reports on all patients with a post mortem diagnosis of mesothelioma.
RESULTS: Over the 4 year study period, there were a total of 146 cases in Leeds; 77% were male. Median age was 74 years (range 36-93). Median survival from diagnosis was 8.9 months. 92% and 8% had histological or cytological confirmation, respectively. 85% had documented evidence of definite or probable exposure to asbestos. 110/146 (75%) had symptomatic pleural effusions at presentation. Twice the number of patients (42 vs 17) were managed with surgical rather than bedside pleurodesis and these had a lower recurrence rate (14% vs 47%; p = 0.02). 122 patients had video assisted thoracoscopic surgery/cutting CT biopsies or chest drains. 73/122 (60%) had prophylactic radiotherapy to these sites. There were seven cases (5%) of tract invasion by tumour and six of these had received prophylactic radiotherapy. Median time to seeding was 174 days. 92/146 (63%) had a performance status of 2 or better at diagnosis but only 54/146 were considered fit for chemotherapy. Of these, 28 (52%) declined chemotherapy; the overall uptake of chemotherapy or entry into a trial was 18%. No patient had radical surgery.
CONCLUSION: This comprehensive population based audit has shown that the median age at presentation of malignant mesothelioma is increasing and baseline performance status and survival is worse than in selected series. 37% of patients were considered suitable for palliative chemotherapy but less than 20% accepted this offer. Thorascopic pleurodesis appears to be associated with fewer recurrences. The role of prophylactic radiotherapy to chest drain and biopsy sites needs reappraisal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18202164     DOI: 10.1136/thx.2007.081430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  19 in total

1.  The incidence of mesothelioma has not decreased for the last twenty years in Southeast region of Anatolia.

Authors:  A I Carkanat; A Abdurrahman; O Abakay; S Cengizhan; S H Selimoglu; A Senyigit
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Systemic Therapy Use and Outcomes After Relapse from Preoperative Radiation and Extrapleural Pneumonectomy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Sara V Soldera; John Kavanagh; Melania Pintilie; Natasha B Leighl; Marc de Perrot; John Cho; Andrew Hope; Ronald Feld; Penelope A Bradbury
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-11-26

3.  Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in 132 patients with malignant mesothelioma.

Authors:  Abdurrahman Abakay; Abdullah C Tanrikulu; Muhammet Ali Kaplan; Mehmet Kucukoner; Ozlem Abakay; Hadice Sen; Abdurrahman Isikdogan; Abdurrahman Senyigit
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2011-10

4.  Prognosis and prognostic factors of patients with mesothelioma: a population-based study.

Authors:  S van der Bij; H Koffijberg; J A Burgers; P Baas; M J van de Vijver; B A J M de Mol; K G M Moons
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  The effect of chemotherapy on health-related quality of life in mesothelioma: results from the SWAMP trial.

Authors:  D T Arnold; C E Hooper; A Morley; P White; I D Lyburn; J Searle; M Darby; T Hall; D Hall; N M Rahman; E De Winton; A Clive; V Masani; A Dangoor; S Guglani; P Jankowska; S A Lowndes; J E Harvey; J P Braybrooke; N A Maskell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Factors associated with survival in a large series of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma in New South Wales.

Authors:  A Linton; N Pavlakis; R O'Connell; M Soeberg; S Kao; S Clarke; J Vardy; N van Zandwijk
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  A multicentre non-blinded randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of regular early specialist symptom control treatment on quality of life in malignant mesothelioma (RESPECT-MESO): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Samal Gunatilake; Fraser J H Brims; Carole Fogg; Iain Lawrie; Nick Maskell; Karen Forbes; Najib Rahman; Steve Morris; Reuben Ogollah; Stephen Gerry; Mick Peake; Liz Darlison; Anoop J Chauhan
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Certified causes of death in patients with mesothelioma in South East England.

Authors:  Catherine Okello; Tom Treasure; Andrew G Nicholson; Julian Peto; Henrik Møller
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Lessons from ecological and spatial studies in relation to occupational lung disease.

Authors:  Anna L Hansell; Nicky G Best; Lesley Rushton
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-04

10.  Active symptom control with or without chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MS01): a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Martin F Muers; Richard J Stephens; Patricia Fisher; Liz Darlison; Christopher M B Higgs; Erica Lowry; Andrew G Nicholson; Mary O'Brien; Michael Peake; Robin Rudd; Michael Snee; Jeremy Steele; David J Girling; Matthew Nankivell; Cheryl Pugh; Mahesh K B Parmar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.