Literature DB >> 18201944

Bayesian sample size calculations for a non-inferiority test of two proportions in clinical trials.

Takashi Daimon1.   

Abstract

In the process of clinical trials and health-care evaluation, Bayesian approaches have increasingly become the center of attention. In this article, sample size calculations for a non-inferiority test of two independent binomial proportions in a clinical trial are considered in a Bayesian framework. The hybrid Neyman-Pearson-Bayesian (hNPB) probability, the conditionally Bayesian (cB) probability and the unconditionally Bayesian (uB) probability are formulated through a conjugate normal analysis. The sample sizes are calculated based on formulas where normal prior distributions are assumed, and are compared with the Neyman-Pearson (NP) sample size. Our results show that the sample size based on the hNPB probability allows us to critically evaluate the appropriateness of the NP sample size. It is suggested that the sample size calculated based on the cB probability formula is smaller than the NP sample size.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18201944     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  2 in total

1.  Opportunities and challenges of clinical trials in cardiology using composite primary endpoints.

Authors:  Geraldine Rauch; Bernhard Rauch; Svenja Schüler; Meinhard Kieser
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-26

2.  Evaluation of the Effects of Pasireotide LAR Administration on Lymphocele Prevention after Axillary Node Dissection for Breast Cancer: Results of a Randomized Non-Comparative Phase 2 Study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Chéreau; Catherine Uzan; Emmanuelle Boutmy-Deslandes; Sarah Zohar; Corinne Bézu; Chafika Mazouni; Jean-Rémi Garbay; Emile Daraï; Roman Rouzier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.