Literature DB >> 18201668

Unrealistic weight loss expectations in candidates for bariatric surgery.

Perry Kaly1, Susan Orellana, Tracy Torrella, Curtis Takagishi, Lisa Saff-Koche, Michel M Murr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unrealistic expectations of weight loss are prevalent in obese patients and can negatively affect their adherence to dietary and health goals. We sought to examine the expectations and perceived notions about weight loss in candidates for bariatric surgery.
METHODS: A total of 284 consecutive and prospective bariatric patients were surveyed using a validated Goals and Relative Weights questionnaire before an educational seminar. The participants categorized their weight loss expectations as "dream," "happy," "acceptable," and "disappointed" and rated the effect of surgically-induced weight loss on 21 indicators of health, quality of life, social functioning, and self-image on a 1-10 scale. The data are presented as the mean +/- standard deviation.
RESULTS: Of the 284 patients, 230 were women and 54 were men (age 45 +/- 10 years; body mass index 50 +/- 8 kg/m(2)). These patients stated that their "dream" weight would be 89% +/- 8% excess body weight loss and that 77% +/- 9%, 67% +/- 10%, 49% +/- 14% excess body weight loss would be their "happy," "acceptable," and "disappointed" weight, respectively. Participants ranked health, fitness, body image, work performance, and self-confidence as the most important benefits of bariatric surgery. Women had greater "happy" and "acceptable" weight loss expectations and put more emphasis on physical presence (r = .17-.33, P <.01). Younger patients put more emphasis on attractiveness and improvements in social and sex life after bariatric surgery (r = .15-.19, P <.01).
CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that although the candidates for bariatric surgery understand its benefits, they have unrealistic expectations of weight loss. In our study, the patients' most modest weight loss expectation, the "disappointed" weight, was equivalent to what providers would consider a successful weight loss outcome after bariatric surgery. Setting realistic expectations is an important aspect of the preoperative evaluation and education, especially for younger women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18201668     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  37 in total

1.  Patient Perspective in Obesity Surgery: Goals for Weight Loss and Improvement of Body Shape in a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Lukas Schmidt; Johannes Sander; Christian Tapking; Thomas Bruckner; Beat-Peter Müller-Stich; Lars Fischer
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.942

Review 2.  Psychosocial evaluation for bariatric surgery: the Boston interview and opportunities for intervention.

Authors:  Stephanie Sogg; DeAnna L Mori
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 4.129

3. 

Authors:  Sean Wharton; David C W Lau; Michael Vallis; Arya M Sharma; Laurent Biertho; Denise Campbell-Scherer; Kristi Adamo; Angela Alberga; Rhonda Bell; Normand Boulé; Elaine Boyling; Jennifer Brown; Betty Calam; Carol Clarke; Lindsay Crowshoe; Dennis Divalentino; Mary Forhan; Yoni Freedhoff; Michel Gagner; Stephen Glazer; Cindy Grand; Michael Green; Margaret Hahn; Raed Hawa; Rita Henderson; Dennis Hong; Pam Hung; Ian Janssen; Kristen Jacklin; Carlene Johnson-Stoklossa; Amy Kemp; Sara Kirk; Jennifer Kuk; Marie-France Langlois; Scott Lear; Ashley McInnes; David Macklin; Leen Naji; Priya Manjoo; Marie-Philippe Morin; Kara Nerenberg; Ian Patton; Sue Pedersen; Leticia Pereira; Helena Piccinini-Vallis; Megha Poddar; Paul Poirier; Denis Prud'homme; Ximena Ramos Salas; Christian Rueda-Clausen; Shelly Russell-Mayhew; Judy Shiau; Diana Sherifali; John Sievenpiper; Sanjeev Sockalingam; Valerie Taylor; Ellen Toth; Laurie Twells; Richard Tytus; Shahebina Walji; Leah Walker; Sonja Wicklum
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Empirical evidence does not support an association between less ambitious pre-treatment goals and better treatment outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  N H Durant; R P Joseph; O H Affuso; G R Dutton; H T Robertson; D B Allison
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.213

5.  Presurgery Weight Loss Goals, Depressive Symptoms, and Weight Loss Among Women Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Kyle E Freese; Andrew D Althouse; Ramesh Ramanathan; Robert P Edwards; Dana H Bovbjerg; Faina Linkov
Journal:  Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 0.607

6.  Bariatric Surgery and Long-term Durability of Weight Loss.

Authors:  Matthew L Maciejewski; David E Arterburn; Lynn Van Scoyoc; Valerie A Smith; William S Yancy; Hollis J Weidenbacher; Edward H Livingston; Maren K Olsen
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Psychological characteristics of patients seeking bariatric treatment versus those seeking medical treatment for obesity: is bariatric surgery a last best hope?

Authors:  Bulle Gaudrat; Séverine Andrieux; Vincent Florent; Amélie Rousseau
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 4.652

8.  Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Mechanick; Adrienne Youdim; Daniel B Jones; W Timothy Garvey; Daniel L Hurley; M Molly McMahon; Leslie J Heinberg; Robert Kushner; Ted D Adams; Scott Shikora; John B Dixon; Stacy Brethauer
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  Discrepancy between ideal and realistic goal weights in three bariatric procedures: who is likely to be unrealistic?

Authors:  Leslie J Heinberg; Kathleen Keating; Laura Simonelli
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Mechanick; Adrienne Youdim; Daniel B Jones; W Timothy Garvey; Daniel L Hurley; M Molly McMahon; Leslie J Heinberg; Robert Kushner; Ted D Adams; Scott Shikora; John B Dixon; Stacy Brethauer
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.