Literature DB >> 18201641

Weight management using the internet a randomized controlled trial.

Christine M Hunter1, Alan L Peterson, Lisa M Alvarez, Walker C Poston, Antoinette R Brundige, C Keith Haddock, David L Van Brunt, John P Foreyt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most weight-loss research targets obese individuals who desire large weight reductions. However, evaluation of weight-gain prevention in overweight individuals is also critical as most Americans become obese as a result of a gradual gain of 1-2 pounds per year over many years.
METHOD: This study evaluated the efficacy of an Internet-based program for weight-loss and weight-gain prevention with a two-group, prospective, randomized controlled trial. A military medical research center with a population of 17,000 active-duty military personnel supplied 446 overweight individuals (222 men; 224 women) with a mean age of 34 years and a mean BMI of 29. Recruitment and study participation occurred 2003-2005 and data were analyzed in 2006. Participants were randomly assigned to receive the 6-month behavioral Internet treatment (BIT, n=227) or usual care (n=224). Change in body weight, BMI, percent body fat, and waist circumference; presented as group by time interactions, were measured.
RESULTS: After 6 months, completers who received BIT lost 1.3 kg while those assigned to usual care gained 0.6 kg (F((df=366))=24.17; I<0.001). Results were similar for the intention-to-treat model. BIT participants also had significant changes in BMI (-0.5 vs +0.2 kg/m(2); F((df=366))=24.58); percent body fat (-0.4 vs +0.6%; F((df=366))=10.45); and waist circumference (-2.1 vs -0.4 cm; F((df=366))=17.09); p<0.001 for all.
CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based weight-management interventions result in small amounts of weight loss, prevent weight gain, and have potential for widespread dissemination as a population health approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00417599.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18201641     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  55 in total

Review 1.  A review of efficacious technology-based weight-loss interventions: five key components.

Authors:  Anna Khaylis; Themis Yiaslas; Jessica Bergstrom; Cheryl Gore-Felton
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Application of persuasion and health behavior theories for behavior change counseling: design of the ADAPT (Avoiding Diabetes Thru Action Plan Targeting) program.

Authors:  Jenny J Lin; Devin M Mann
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-07-06

3.  2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society.

Authors:  Michael D Jensen; Donna H Ryan; Caroline M Apovian; Jamy D Ard; Anthony G Comuzzie; Karen A Donato; Frank B Hu; Van S Hubbard; John M Jakicic; Robert F Kushner; Catherine M Loria; Barbara E Millen; Cathy A Nonas; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; June Stevens; Victor J Stevens; Thomas A Wadden; Bruce M Wolfe; Susan Z Yanovski; Harmon S Jordan; Karima A Kendall; Linda J Lux; Roycelynn Mentor-Marcel; Laura C Morgan; Michael G Trisolini; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Recent advances in internet-delivered, evidence-based weight control programs for adults.

Authors:  Rebecca A Krukowski; Delia Smith West; Jean Harvey-Berino
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-01

Review 5.  The correlates and treatment of obesity in military populations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paul W Sanderson; Stacy A Clemes; Stuart J H Biddle
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.942

6.  When it comes to lifestyle recommendations, more is sometimes less: a meta-analysis of theoretical assumptions underlying the effectiveness of interventions promoting multiple behavior domain change.

Authors:  Kristina Wilson; Ibrahim Senay; Marta Durantini; Flor Sánchez; Michael Hennessy; Bonnie Spring; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Dissemination of the Look AHEAD Intensive Lifestyle Intervention in the United States Military: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Rebecca A Krukowski; Marion E Hare; Gerald W Talcott; Leslie A Gladney; Karen C Johnson; Phyllis A Richey; Mehmet Kocak; Patrick L Keller; Ann Hryshko-Mullen; Robert C Klesges
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 8.  Lifestyle interventions for cardiovascular disease risk reduction: a systematic review of the effects of diet composition, food provision, and treatment modality on weight loss.

Authors:  Gareth R Dutton; Melissa H Laitner; Michael G Perri
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 9.  Periodic prompts and reminders in health promotion and health behavior interventions: systematic review.

Authors:  Jillian P Fry; Roni A Neff
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Exploring the mechanisms of weight loss in the SHED-IT intervention for overweight men: a mediation analysis.

Authors:  David R Lubans; Philip J Morgan; Clare E Collins; Janet M Warren; Robin Callister
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.