Literature DB >> 18201402

Cervical screening: why young women should be encouraged to be screened.

Amanda Herbert1, Gillian Holdsworth, Ali A Kubba.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The English National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP) recommendation not to offer cervical screening to women aged 20-24 years is considered in the context of national rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) and invasive cervical carcinoma, falling screening coverage in young women, detection of screen-detected invasive cancers and risks of excisional treatment of CIN.
METHODS: Registrations of invasive and in situ cervical carcinoma were obtained from the Office for National Statistics, data on screening coverage and cytology results from the NHSCSP website and data on screen-detected cancers from an audit at Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTFT).
RESULTS: Before and after the introduction of organised screening in England, CIN3 was primarily detected in women aged 20-39 years. Increasing rates of CIN3 were recorded in women aged 20-24 years during the last decade (3000-4000 cases per year) despite falling screening coverage. The peak incidence of invasive cancer in screening age groups is now 35-39 years. At GSTFT in 1999-2006, 24 of 32 cancers (75%) in women aged 20-34 years were screen-detected and that percentage declined in subsequent 15-year age bands (p < or =0.0001). DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: Delaying the age for screening eligibility carries a risk of CIN becoming more extensive, and therefore more difficult to excise, as well as a risk of progression. The NHSCSP should reconsider its decision and encourage young women to be screened, not excluding those aged 20-24 years. Facilities for taking the tests should be made more convenient. Women should be informed that low-grade CIN is potentially reversible and may safely be monitored. Cervical screening also provides an opportunity for education on healthy lifestyles and safer sex while treatment should be reserved for high-grade CIN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18201402     DOI: 10.1783/147118908783332078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1471-1893


  5 in total

1.  The effects of gender and age on health related behaviors.

Authors:  Amanda Deeks; Catherine Lombard; Janet Michelmore; Helena Teede
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Characteristics and screening history of women diagnosed with cervical cancer aged 20-29 years.

Authors:  A Castanon; V M W Leung; R Landy; A W W Lim; P Sasieni
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Effectiveness of cervical screening with age: population based case-control study of prospectively recorded data.

Authors:  Peter Sasieni; Alejandra Castanon; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28

4.  Cervical cancer screening service utilisation in UK.

Authors:  Alexander Labeit; Frank Peinemann; Abbi Kedir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Comment on 'Characteristics and screening history of women diagnosed with cervical cancer aged 20-29'.

Authors:  A Herbert; G Holdsworth; A A Kubba
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.