Literature DB >> 18201338

Peripheral refraction measurement: does it matter if one turns the eye or the head?

Hema Radhakrishnan1, W Neil Charman.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that, following eye movements, the changing pressures exerted by the extraocular muscles and the lids might distort the shape of the eyeball and alter refraction across the visual field. To confirm or refute this hypothesis, the pattern of monocular peripheral refraction in the right eyes of 10 healthy young adults was measured either by turning the eye to fixate a series of horizontally spaced targets or by turning the head to view the same targets while maintaining central fixation and the eye in its primary position. In each case a fixed Shin-Nippon autorefractor was used to measure peripheral refraction at 5 degrees intervals over the central +/-30 degrees of the visual field. The duration of any eye turn was < or =1 min. Repeated-measures analysis showed no significant differences between the spherical equivalents of peripheral refraction measured under the two conditions (p = 0.223). A further study of five subjects involving 2.5-min periods of fixation with an eye or head turn of 25 degrees also showed no significant refractive differences. Thus, within the conditions of the study (eye-turn durations and field angles < or =2.5 min and 30 degrees respectively), the results fail to confirm the occurrence of large differences in peripheral refraction when measurements are made with eye turn rather than head turn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18201338     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00521.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  8 in total

1.  Comparing the relative peripheral refraction effect of single vision and multifocal contact lenses measured using an autorefractor and an aberrometer: A pilot study.

Authors:  Ravi C Bakaraju; Cathleen Fedtke; Klaus Ehrmann; Arthur Ho
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-02-07

2.  Central and peripheral autorefraction repeatability in normal eyes.

Authors:  Kelly E Moore; David A Berntsen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Peripheral defocus and myopia progression in myopic children randomly assigned to wear single vision and progressive addition lenses.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Christopher D Barr; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Peripheral refraction and higher-order aberrations with cycloplegia and fogging lenses using the BHVI-EyeMapper.

Authors:  Ravi Chandra Bakaraju; Cathleen Fedtke; Klaus Ehrmann; Darrin Falk; Varghese Thomas; Brien Anthony Holden
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-07-17

5.  Peripheral Refraction and Eye Lengths in Myopic Children in the Bifocal Lenses In Nearsighted Kids (BLINK) Study.

Authors:  Donald O Mutti; Loraine T Sinnott; Kathleen S Reuter; Maria K Walker; David A Berntsen; Lisa A Jones-Jordan; Jeffrey J Walline
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Factors Regulating Juvenile Refractive Development and Eye Growth.

Authors:  Kai Yip Choi; Henry Ho-Lung Chan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  The BHVI-EyeMapper: peripheral refraction and aberration profiles.

Authors:  Cathleen Fedtke; Klaus Ehrmann; Darrin Falk; Ravi C Bakaraju; Brien A Holden
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Altered spatial summation optimizes visual function in axial myopia.

Authors:  Victoria Stapley; Roger S Anderson; Kathryn J Saunders; Pádraig J Mulholland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.