Literature DB >> 18201121

The role of pause cues in language learning: the emergence of event-related potentials related to sequence processing.

Jutta L Mueller1, Joerg Bahlmann, Angela D Friederici.   

Abstract

Humans can derive sequential dependencies from unfamiliar artificial speech within several of minutes of exposure. However, there is an ongoing debate about the nature of the underlying learning processes. In a widely discussed study Peña et al. [Peña, M., Bonatti, L. L., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. Signal-driven computations in speech processing. Science, 298, 604-607, 2002] argued for the importance of subtle acoustic cues in the signal, such as pauses, in order to switch between two computational mechanisms, which are conceptualized as rule-based versus statistical. The present study was aimed to approach this problem by recording event-related potentials in response to correct and incorrect phrases consisting of bisyllabics after short exposure to either rule-based or random artificial speech streams. Rule-based streams contained dependencies of the form AXC, whereby A elements reliably predicted the C elements and X elements were variable. Participants were exposed to four input and test phases. Two of the input streams were rule-based and contained either only probabilistic information related to the distribution of the AXC stimuli or an additional acoustic cue indicating the boundaries of relevant units. The other two streams were random variations of the rule-based streams. During the test phase in the condition with pause cues, an early negativity and a later positivity emerged for correct and incorrect items in comparison to their acoustically identical counterparts, which were presented after the random control condition. In the noncued condition, only negativities were seen. The timing and the scalp distribution of the negativities were different for correct and incorrect sequences in both the cued and the noncued conditions. The results are interpreted in support of a view of grammatical learning in which both distributional and acoustic cues may contribute to different aspects of syntactic learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18201121     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

Review 1.  What's statistical about learning? Insights from modelling statistical learning as a set of memory processes.

Authors:  Erik D Thiessen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Neurophysiological mechanisms involved in language learning in adults.

Authors:  Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells; Toni Cunillera; Anna Mestres-Missé; Ruth de Diego-Balaguer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Similar Neural Correlates for Language and Sequential Learning: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Morten H Christiansen; Christopher M Conway; Luca Onnis
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-01-01

4.  Prosodic cues enhance rule learning by changing speech segmentation mechanisms.

Authors:  Ruth de Diego-Balaguer; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells; Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-30

5.  Sleep-Driven Computations in Speech Processing.

Authors:  Rebecca L A Frost; Padraic Monaghan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mark my words: High frequency marker words impact early stages of language learning.

Authors:  Rebecca L A Frost; Padraic Monaghan; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Syntactic learning by mere exposure--an ERP study in adult learners.

Authors:  Jutta L Mueller; Regine Oberecker; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 8.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of statistical-sequential learning: what do event-related potentials tell us?

Authors:  Jerome Daltrozzo; Christopher M Conway
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.