Literature DB >> 18200786

Accuracy of bracket placement by orthodontists and inexperienced dental students.

David Armstrong1, Gang Shen, Peter Petocz, M Ali Darendeliler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Well-finished orthodontic treatment begins with accurate positioning of the brackets on the teeth. AIMS: To compare the positions of orthodontic brackets placed by experienced clinicians and inexperienced trainees.
METHODS: Twenty orthodontists (13 male, 7 female) representing experienced specialists, and 20 final year dental students (10 male, 10 female) representing inexperienced trainees, were asked to bond pre-adjusted straight-wire brackets at the centres of the clinical crowns of the teeth in a Class I crowded typodont set-up. The teeth were removed from the typodont, placed in a standardised jig and photographed. The vertical, mesiodistal and angular (tip) positions of the brackets, relative to the centres of the clinical crowns, were measured with the aid of imaging software. The accuracy of bracket placement by the groups was compared.
RESULTS: The dental students took significantly longer than orthodontists to place the brackets (50.65 +/- 16.33 minutes vs 28.53 +/- 9.51 minutes, p < 0.001), but were more accurate than the orthodontists at positioning the brackets vertically (0.90 +/- 0.21 mm vs 1.19 +/- 0.23 mm, p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the dental students and the specialists in either the mesio-distal or the angular/tip positions of the brackets (p > 0.05). Both groups tended to bond the brackets with a distal tip. The students had slightly more right-left differences than the orthodontists. Mesio-distal errors in bracket placement were associated with rotated and displaced teeth.
CONCLUSIONS: Accurate direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to teeth does not appear to be related to clinical experience or specialist training.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18200786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Orthod J        ISSN: 0587-3908


  6 in total

1.  Influence of clinical experience on accuracy of virtual orthodontic attachment bonding in comparison with the direct procedure.

Authors:  Natalice S De Oliveira; Emile Rossouw; Elizabeth M B Lages; Soraia Macari; Henrique Pretti
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays.

Authors:  Julia Plattner; Ahmed Othman; Jassin Arnold; Constantin von See
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-12-01

3.  Comparison of the accuracy of bracket placement with height bracket positioning gauge and boone gauge.

Authors:  Amir Mohammadi; Seyed Hossein Moslemzadeh
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2011-12-19

4.  Modified bracket positioning holder.

Authors:  M B Raghuraj; Nandish Shetty
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2011-04

5.  Comparison of the accuracy of bracket positioning between direct and digital indirect bonding techniques in the maxillary arch: a three-dimensional study.

Authors:  Rami Aboujaoude; Roland Kmeid; Carine Gebrael; Elie Amm
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.247

6.  Evaluation of the prototype of a new bracket-positioning gauge.

Authors:  Sergio Luiz Mota Júnior; Marcio José da Silva Campos; Carina Abrantes Schmitberger; Juliana de Andrade Vitral; Marcelo Reis Fraga; Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.