BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest a positive association between markers of trans-fatty acid intake and prostate cancer. We therefore prospectively evaluated the association between blood trans-fatty acid levels and risk of prostate cancer. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study among 14,916 apparently healthy men who provided blood samples in 1982. Blood fatty acid levels were determined for 476 men diagnosed with prostate cancer during a 13-year follow-up and their matched controls. Controls were individually matched to cases according to age and smoking status at baseline. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the relative risk and 95% confidence interval of total, nonaggressive (stage A/B and low grade), and aggressive (stage C/D, high grade, subsequent distant metastasis or death) prostate cancer associated with blood levels of specific trans-fatty acids. RESULTS:Blood levels of all the trans-fatty acids examined were unrelated to total prostate cancer risk. When results were divided according to tumor aggressiveness, blood levels of 18:1n-9t, all the 18:2t examined, and total trans-fatty acids were positively associated to nonaggressive tumors. The relative risks (95% confidence intervals; P trend) comparing top with bottom quintile trans-fatty acid levels were 2.16 (1.12-4.17; 0.11) for 18:1n-9t, 1.97 (1.03-3.75; 0.01) for total 18:2t, and 2.21 (1.14-4.29; 0.06) for total trans-fatty acids. None of the trans fats examined was associated with aggressive prostate tumors. CONCLUSION:Blood levels of trans isomers of oleic and linoleic acids are associated with an increased risk of nonaggressive prostate tumors. As this type of tumors represents a large proportion of prostate cancer detected using prostate-specific antigen screening, these findings may have implications for the prevention of prostate cancer.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest a positive association between markers of trans-fatty acid intake and prostate cancer. We therefore prospectively evaluated the association between blood trans-fatty acid levels and risk of prostate cancer. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study among 14,916 apparently healthy men who provided blood samples in 1982. Blood fatty acid levels were determined for 476 men diagnosed with prostate cancer during a 13-year follow-up and their matched controls. Controls were individually matched to cases according to age and smoking status at baseline. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the relative risk and 95% confidence interval of total, nonaggressive (stage A/B and low grade), and aggressive (stage C/D, high grade, subsequent distant metastasis or death) prostate cancer associated with blood levels of specific trans-fatty acids. RESULTS: Blood levels of all the trans-fatty acids examined were unrelated to total prostate cancer risk. When results were divided according to tumor aggressiveness, blood levels of 18:1n-9t, all the 18:2t examined, and total trans-fatty acids were positively associated to nonaggressive tumors. The relative risks (95% confidence intervals; P trend) comparing top with bottom quintile trans-fatty acid levels were 2.16 (1.12-4.17; 0.11) for 18:1n-9t, 1.97 (1.03-3.75; 0.01) for total 18:2t, and 2.21 (1.14-4.29; 0.06) for total trans-fatty acids. None of the trans fats examined was associated with aggressive prostate tumors. CONCLUSION: Blood levels of trans isomers of oleic and linoleic acids are associated with an increased risk of nonaggressive prostate tumors. As this type of tumors represents a large proportion of prostate cancer detected using prostate-specific antigen screening, these findings may have implications for the prevention of prostate cancer.
Authors: Theodore M Brasky; Cathee Till; Emily White; Marian L Neuhouser; Xiaoling Song; Phyllis Goodman; Ian M Thompson; Irena B King; Demetrius Albanes; Alan R Kristal Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-04-24 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jorge E Chavarro; Jeremy Furtado; Thomas L Toth; Jennifer Ford; Myra Keller; Hannia Campos; Russ Hauser Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2010-11-11 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Anne C M Thiébaut; Li Jiao; Debra T Silverman; Amanda J Cross; Frances E Thompson; Amy F Subar; Albert R Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Rachael Z Stolzenberg-Solomon Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-06-26 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Meng Yang; Azalea Ayuningtyas; Stacey A Kenfield; Howard D Sesso; Hannia Campos; Jing Ma; Meir J Stampfer; Jorge E Chavarro Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Colleen Pelser; Alison M Mondul; Albert R Hollenbeck; Yikyung Park Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Ka He; Pengcheng Xun; Theodore M Brasky; Marilie D Gammon; June Stevens; Emily White Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Srinivas Pentyala; Terry Whyard; Sahana Pentyala; John Muller; John Pfail; Sunjit Parmar; Carlos G Helguero; Sardar Khan Journal: Biomed Rep Date: 2016-01-29