UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to determine if pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) exposures could enhance tumor uptake of (111)In-MX-B3, a murine IgG1kappa monoclonal antibody directed against the Le(y) antigen. METHODS: MX-B3 was labeled with (111)In, purified, and confirmed for its binding to the antigen-positive A431 cell line. Groups of nude mice were inoculated subcutaneously with A431 tumor cells on both hind flanks. A tumor on one flank was treated with pulsed-HIFU; the other tumor was used as an untreated control. Within 10 min after the HIFU exposure, the mice received intravenous (111)In-MX-B3 for imaging and biodistribution studies. Mice were euthanized at 1, 24, 48, and 120 h after injection for biodistribution studies. RESULTS: The HIFU exposure shortened the peak tumor uptake time (24 vs. 48 h for the control) and increased the peak tumor uptake value (38 vs. 25 %ID/g [percentage injected dose per gram] for the control). The HIFU effect on enhancing tumor uptake was greater at earlier times up to 24 h, but the effect was gradually diminished thereafter. The HIFU effect on enhancing tumor uptake was substantiated by nuclear imaging studies. HIFU also increased the uptake of the antibody in surrounding tissues, but the net increase was marginal compared with the increase in tumor uptake. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that pulsed-HIFU significantly enhances the delivery of (111)In-MX-B3 in human epidermoid tumors xenografted in nude mice. The results of this pilot study warrant further evaluation of other treatment regimens, such as repeated HIFU exposures for greater delivery enhancement of antibodies labeled with cytotoxic radioisotopes or pulsed-HIFU exposure in addition to a combined therapy of (90)Y-B3 and taxol to enhance the synergistic effect.
UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to determine if pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) exposures could enhance tumor uptake of (111)In-MX-B3, a murine IgG1kappa monoclonal antibody directed against the Le(y) antigen. METHODS: MX-B3 was labeled with (111)In, purified, and confirmed for its binding to the antigen-positive A431 cell line. Groups of nude mice were inoculated subcutaneously with A431 tumor cells on both hind flanks. A tumor on one flank was treated with pulsed-HIFU; the other tumor was used as an untreated control. Within 10 min after the HIFU exposure, the mice received intravenous (111)In-MX-B3 for imaging and biodistribution studies. Mice were euthanized at 1, 24, 48, and 120 h after injection for biodistribution studies. RESULTS: The HIFU exposure shortened the peak tumor uptake time (24 vs. 48 h for the control) and increased the peak tumor uptake value (38 vs. 25 %ID/g [percentage injected dose per gram] for the control). The HIFU effect on enhancing tumor uptake was greater at earlier times up to 24 h, but the effect was gradually diminished thereafter. The HIFU effect on enhancing tumor uptake was substantiated by nuclear imaging studies. HIFU also increased the uptake of the antibody in surrounding tissues, but the net increase was marginal compared with the increase in tumor uptake. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that pulsed-HIFU significantly enhances the delivery of (111)In-MX-B3 in humanepidermoid tumors xenografted in nude mice. The results of this pilot study warrant further evaluation of other treatment regimens, such as repeated HIFU exposures for greater delivery enhancement of antibodies labeled with cytotoxic radioisotopes or pulsed-HIFU exposure in addition to a combined therapy of (90)Y-B3 and taxol to enhance the synergistic effect.
Authors: Shutao Wang; In Soo Shin; Hilary Hancock; Beom-su Jang; Hyung-sub Kim; Sang Myung Lee; Vesna Zderic; Victor Frenkel; Ira Pastan; Chang H Paik; Matthew R Dreher Journal: J Control Release Date: 2012-06-23 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Xin Chen; Petr Novák; Donald G Benson; Jessica S Webber; Leah Hennings; Gal Shafirstein; Peter M Corry; Robert J Griffin; Eduardo G Moros Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Ali Mohammadabadi; Ruby N Huynh; Aniket S Wadajkar; Rena G Lapidus; Anthony J Kim; Christopher B Raub; Victor Frenkel Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Hilary Hancock; Matthew R Dreher; Nigel Crawford; Claire B Pollock; Jennifer Shih; Bradford J Wood; Kent Hunter; Victor Frenkel Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2009-06-11 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Yi Zhao; Daria Y Alakhova; Jong Oh Kim; Tatiana K Bronich; Alexander V Kabanov Journal: J Control Release Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Hilary A Hancock; Lauren H Smith; Julian Cuesta; Amir K Durrani; Mary Angstadt; Mark L Palmeri; Eitan Kimmel; Victor Frenkel Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2009-07-17 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Brian E O'Neill; Howard Vo; Mary Angstadt; King P C Li; Tim Quinn; Victor Frenkel Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Tong Li; Yak-Nam Wang; Tatiana D Khokhlova; Samantha D'Andrea; Frank Starr; Hong Chen; Jeannine S McCune; Linda J Risler; Afshin Mashadi-Hossein; Sunil R Hingorani; Amy Chang; Joo Ha Hwang Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 12.701