Literature DB >> 18197943

Total gastric transposition is better than partial gastric tube esophagoplasty for esophageal replacement in children.

U Tannuri1, A C A Tannuri, M E P Gonçalves, S R Cardoso.   

Abstract

Whenever the surgeon uses the stomach as an esophageal substitute, either one of two techniques is generally performed: total gastric transposition or gastric tube esophagoplasty. No existing reports compare the complications associated with these two surgical procedures. The purpose of this study is to review the authors' experience with total gastric transposition and verify whether this technique is superior to gastric tube esophagoplasty in children by comparing the main complications with those reported in the publications of gastric tubes esophagoplasties in the English language literature published in the last 38 years. A total of 35 children underwent total gastric transposition according to the classical technique. Most of these patients (27, or 77.1%) had long gap esophageal atresia. The most frequently observed complications were compared to those reported in nine studies of gastric tube esophagoplasty comprising 184 patients. Mortality and graft failure rates were also compared. Seven patients (20.0%) presented with leaks, all of which closed spontaneously. Six children were reoperated, three experienced gastric outlet obstruction secondary to axial torsion of the stomach placed in the retrosternal space and the other three experienced delayed gastric emptying that required revision of the piloroplasty. There were two deaths (5.7%) and no graft failure. Strictures were observed in five patients (14.2%) and all of these were resolved with endoscopic dilatations. Six patients had diarrhea that spontaneously resolved. In the late follow-up period, all patients were on full feed and thriving well. The comparisons with gastric tube patients demonstrated that the total gastric transposition group presented with significantly less leaks and strictures (P = 0.0001 and 0.001, respectively). The incidence of death and graft failure was not statistically different. In conclusion, gastric transposition is as a simple technical procedure for esophageal replacement in children with satisfactory results, and is superior to gastric tube esophagoplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18197943     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00737.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  6 in total

1.  Partial gastric pull-up in the treatment of patients with long-gap esophageal atresia.

Authors:  Marc Reismann; Tina Granholm; Henrik Ehrén
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.764

2.  Evaluation of Bilayer Silk Fibroin Grafts for Tubular Esophagoplasty in a Porcine Defect Model.

Authors:  Gokhan Gundogdu; Duncan Morhardt; Vivian Cristofaro; Khalid Algarrahi; Xuehui Yang; Kyle Costa; Cinthia Galvez Alegria; Maryrose P Sullivan; Joshua R Mauney
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Outcomes of primary gastric transposition for long-gap esophageal atresia in neonates.

Authors:  Zhandong Zeng; Fengli Liu; Juan Ma; Yun Fang; Hongwei Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 4.  Surgical outcomes of different approaches to esophageal replacement in long-gap esophageal atresia: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Yifan Yang; Chao Zheng; Rui Dong; Shan Zheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Repair of long-gap esophageal atresia: gastric conduits may improve outcome-a 20-year single center experience.

Authors:  Catherine J Hunter; Mikael Petrosyan; Meghan E Connelly; Henri R Ford; Nam X Nguyen
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Prospective evaluation of clinical outcomes and quality of life after gastric tube interposition as esophageal reconstruction in children.

Authors:  Joong Kee Youn; Taejin Park; Soo-Hong Kim; Ji-Won Han; Hyo-Jeong Jang; Chaeyoun Oh; Jin Soo Moon; Young Hun Choi; Kwi-Won Park; Sung-Eun Jung; Hyun-Young Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.