OBJECTIVE: The neurobiological mechanisms of deviant sexual preferences such as pedophilia are largely unknown. The objective of this study was to analyze whether brain activation patterns of homosexual pedophiles differed from those of a nonpedophile homosexual control group during visual sexual stimulation. METHOD: A consecutive sample of 11 pedophile forensic inpatients exclusively attracted to boys and 12 age-matched homosexual control participants from a comparable socioeconomic stratum underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging during a visual sexual stimulation procedure that used sexually stimulating and emotionally neutral photographs. Sexual arousal was assessed according to a subjective rating scale. RESULTS: In contrast to sexually neutral pictures, in both groups sexually arousing pictures having both homosexual and pedophile content activated brain areas known to be involved in processing visual stimuli containing emotional content, including the occipitotemporal and prefrontal cortices. However, during presentation of the respective sexual stimuli, the thalamus, globus pallidus and striatum, which correspond to the key areas of the brain involved in sexual arousal and behaviour, showed significant activation in pedophiles, but not in control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Central processing of visual sexual stimuli in homosexual pedophiles seems to be comparable to that in nonpedophile control subjects. However, compared with homosexual control subjects, activation patterns in pedophiles refer more strongly to subcortical regions, which have previously been discussed in the context of processing reward signals and also play an important role in addictive and stimulus-controlled behaviour. Thus future studies should further elucidate the specificity of these brain regions for the processing of sexual stimuli in pedophilia and should address the generally weaker activation pattern in homosexual men.
OBJECTIVE: The neurobiological mechanisms of deviant sexual preferences such as pedophilia are largely unknown. The objective of this study was to analyze whether brain activation patterns of homosexual pedophiles differed from those of a nonpedophile homosexual control group during visual sexual stimulation. METHOD: A consecutive sample of 11 pedophile forensic inpatients exclusively attracted to boys and 12 age-matched homosexual control participants from a comparable socioeconomic stratum underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging during a visual sexual stimulation procedure that used sexually stimulating and emotionally neutral photographs. Sexual arousal was assessed according to a subjective rating scale. RESULTS: In contrast to sexually neutral pictures, in both groups sexually arousing pictures having both homosexual and pedophile content activated brain areas known to be involved in processing visual stimuli containing emotional content, including the occipitotemporal and prefrontal cortices. However, during presentation of the respective sexual stimuli, the thalamus, globus pallidus and striatum, which correspond to the key areas of the brain involved in sexual arousal and behaviour, showed significant activation in pedophiles, but not in control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Central processing of visual sexual stimuli in homosexual pedophiles seems to be comparable to that in nonpedophile control subjects. However, compared with homosexual control subjects, activation patterns in pedophiles refer more strongly to subcortical regions, which have previously been discussed in the context of processing reward signals and also play an important role in addictive and stimulus-controlled behaviour. Thus future studies should further elucidate the specificity of these brain regions for the processing of sexual stimuli in pedophilia and should address the generally weaker activation pattern in homosexual men.
Entities:
Keywords:
magnetic resonance imaging, functional; pedophilia; sexual behaviour
Authors: J Redouté; S Stoléru; M C Grégoire; N Costes; L Cinotti; F Lavenne; D Le Bars; M G Forest; J F Pujol Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: K Blum; E R Braverman; J M Holder; J F Lubar; V J Monastra; D Miller; J O Lubar; T J Chen; D E Comings Journal: J Psychoactive Drugs Date: 2000-11
Authors: Timm B Poeppl; Simon B Eickhoff; Peter T Fox; Angela R Laird; Rainer Rupprecht; Berthold Langguth; Danilo Bzdok Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Christian Kärgel; Claudia Massau; Simone Weiß; Martin Walter; Viola Borchardt; Tillmann H C Krueger; Gilian Tenbergen; Jonas Kneer; Matthias Wittfoth; Alexander Pohl; Hannah Gerwinn; Jorge Ponseti; Till Amelung; Klaus M Beier; Sebastian Mohnke; Henrik Walter; Boris Schiffer Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Joseph C Cheng; Joseph Secondary; William H Burke; J Paul Fedoroff; R Gregg Dwyer Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Gilian Tenbergen; Matthias Wittfoth; Helge Frieling; Jorge Ponseti; Martin Walter; Henrik Walter; Klaus M Beier; Boris Schiffer; Tillmann H C Kruger Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Jorge Ponseti; Daniel Bruhn; Julia Nolting; Hannah Gerwinn; Alexander Pohl; Aglaja Stirn; Oliver Granert; Helmut Laufs; Günther Deuschl; Stephan Wolff; Olav Jansen; Hartwig Siebner; Peer Briken; Sebastian Mohnke; Till Amelung; Jonas Kneer; Boris Schiffer; Henrik Walter; Tillmann H C Kruger Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2018-01-23 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Kirsten Jordan; Peter Fromberger; Helge Laubinger; Peter Dechent; Jürgen L Müller Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2014-05-17 Impact factor: 3.630