STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review and multivariate analysis. OBJECTIVE: Assess cervical spine segmental range of motion (ROM) with flexion/extension (F/E) radiographs and determine the relation to clinical variables. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies investigated the roles of age and degeneration on cervical ROM with univariate analyses. Multivariate analyses are required to account for multiple factors that may affect ROM and quantify their relative effects. METHODS: Radiographs of 195 patients were analyzed, including 133 females and 62 males with ages ranging from 15 to 93 years. Segmental ROM and Kellgren score (KS) of degeneration were assessed for C2-C7. Patient's age and gender were documented. Multivariate analyses were performed for each level. Independent variables evaluated were: (1) KS at the level of interest, (2) KS at the level above, (3) KS at the level below, (4) age, and (5) gender. Significance was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: Interobserver reliabilities for assessing KS (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.81) and segmental ROM (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.72) were good to excellent. Age had a significant negative association with ROM at C2-C3, C3-C4, C4-C5, and C5-C6. KS at the level of interest had a significant negative association with ROM at C2-C3, C3-C4, C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7. KS at the inferior segment had a significant positive association with ROM at C2-C3, C3-C4, and C4-C5. Gender had a significant association with ROM only at C2-C3. CONCLUSION: Age was associated with declining ROM independent of degeneration, amounting to a 5 degrees decrease in subaxial cervical ROM every 10 years. Degeneration was also associated with ROM. For every point increase in KS at a given level, there was an associated 1.2 degrees decrease in ROM at that level, and a 0.8 degrees increase in ROM at the level above. These results provide a framework with which to counsel patients about cervical ROM and a benchmark from which procedure specific changes can be compared.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review and multivariate analysis. OBJECTIVE: Assess cervical spine segmental range of motion (ROM) with flexion/extension (F/E) radiographs and determine the relation to clinical variables. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies investigated the roles of age and degeneration on cervical ROM with univariate analyses. Multivariate analyses are required to account for multiple factors that may affect ROM and quantify their relative effects. METHODS: Radiographs of 195 patients were analyzed, including 133 females and 62 males with ages ranging from 15 to 93 years. Segmental ROM and Kellgren score (KS) of degeneration were assessed for C2-C7. Patient's age and gender were documented. Multivariate analyses were performed for each level. Independent variables evaluated were: (1) KS at the level of interest, (2) KS at the level above, (3) KS at the level below, (4) age, and (5) gender. Significance was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: Interobserver reliabilities for assessing KS (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.81) and segmental ROM (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.72) were good to excellent. Age had a significant negative association with ROM at C2-C3, C3-C4, C4-C5, and C5-C6. KS at the level of interest had a significant negative association with ROM at C2-C3, C3-C4, C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7. KS at the inferior segment had a significant positive association with ROM at C2-C3, C3-C4, and C4-C5. Gender had a significant association with ROM only at C2-C3. CONCLUSION: Age was associated with declining ROM independent of degeneration, amounting to a 5 degrees decrease in subaxial cervical ROM every 10 years. Degeneration was also associated with ROM. For every point increase in KS at a given level, there was an associated 1.2 degrees decrease in ROM at that level, and a 0.8 degrees increase in ROM at the level above. These results provide a framework with which to counsel patients about cervical ROM and a benchmark from which procedure specific changes can be compared.
Authors: Azucena G Rodriguez; Ana E Rodriguez-Soto; Andrew J Burghardt; Sigurd Berven; Sharmila Majumdar; Jeffrey C Lotz Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Sang-Hun Lee; Scott D Daffner; Jeffrey C Wang; Barry C Davis; Ahmet Alanay; Jung Suk Kim Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Bradley J Hindman; Robert P From; Ricardo B Fontes; Vincent C Traynelis; Michael M Todd; M Bridget Zimmerman; Christian M Puttlitz; Brandon G Santoni Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Daniel G Cobian; Andrew C Sterling; Paul A Anderson; Bryan C Heiderscheit Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2009-03-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Mazda K Turel; Sauradeep Sarkar; Krishna Prabhu; Roy T Daniel; K S Jacob; Ari G Chacko Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 3.134