AIM: To measure, by a quantitative approach, the gene expression underlying the results of somatostatin receptor (sst) scintigraphy ((111)In-DTPA-octreotide) and noradrenaline transporter (NAT) scintigraphy ((123)I-MIBG) in patients with neuroendocrine (NE) tumors. METHODS: The gene expression of somatostatin receptors 1-5 (sst) and NAT was measured quantitatively by real-time PCR in a group of patients with NE tumors (n = 14) and compared to a group of patients with colorectal adenocarcinomas (n = 15). If available, scintigraphic results were compared with gene expression results (9 octreotide and 3 MIBG scintigraphies). RESULTS: The sst(2) was upregulated in 13 of 14 patients (93%) with NE tumors, and the absolute level of gene expression was highest for sst(2). Gene expression alterations of NAT and the other sst subtypes were more variable. Gene expression of sst(2) was in all cases in agreement with positive octreotide scintigraphies. In 2 of 3 cases where MIBG scintigraphy was positive, NAT was also upregulated. Sst(2) was generally downregulated in the colorectal tumor group with the gene expression of the other receptors being more heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: In general, changes in gene expression of sst(2) corresponded with scintigraphic results. Our data support that sst(2) is the best target for visualization of NE tumors, whereas NAT is only a useful target in a subpopulation of NE tumors. Comparison of scintigraphic results with quantitative gene expression may be used to achieve a better understanding of the link between them, which in turn could aid in planning and development of noninvasive molecular imaging of key molecular processes. (c)2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
AIM: To measure, by a quantitative approach, the gene expression underlying the results of somatostatin receptor (sst) scintigraphy ((111)In-DTPA-octreotide) and noradrenaline transporter (NAT) scintigraphy ((123)I-MIBG) in patients with neuroendocrine (NE) tumors. METHODS: The gene expression of somatostatin receptors 1-5 (sst) and NAT was measured quantitatively by real-time PCR in a group of patients with NE tumors (n = 14) and compared to a group of patients with colorectal adenocarcinomas (n = 15). If available, scintigraphic results were compared with gene expression results (9 octreotide and 3 MIBG scintigraphies). RESULTS: The sst(2) was upregulated in 13 of 14 patients (93%) with NE tumors, and the absolute level of gene expression was highest for sst(2). Gene expression alterations of NAT and the other sst subtypes were more variable. Gene expression of sst(2) was in all cases in agreement with positive octreotide scintigraphies. In 2 of 3 cases where MIBG scintigraphy was positive, NAT was also upregulated. Sst(2) was generally downregulated in the colorectal tumor group with the gene expression of the other receptors being more heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: In general, changes in gene expression of sst(2) corresponded with scintigraphic results. Our data support that sst(2) is the best target for visualization of NE tumors, whereas NAT is only a useful target in a subpopulation of NE tumors. Comparison of scintigraphic results with quantitative gene expression may be used to achieve a better understanding of the link between them, which in turn could aid in planning and development of noninvasive molecular imaging of key molecular processes. (c)2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
Authors: Ingrid H Olsen; Seppo W Langer; Birgitte H Federspiel; Jytte Oxbøl; Annika Loft; Anne Kiil Berthelsen; Jann Mortensen; Peter Oturai; Ulrich Knigge; Andreas Kjær Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-01-28
Authors: Anncatrine Luisa Petersen; Jonas Rosager Henriksen; Tina Binderup; Dennis Ringkjøbing Elema; Palle Hedengran Rasmussen; Anne Mette Hag; Andreas Kjær; Thomas Lars Andresen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Tina Binderup; Ulrich Knigge; Camilla Bardram Johnbeck; Annika Loft; Anne Kiil Berthelsen; Peter Oturai; Jann Mortensen; Birgitte Federspiel; Seppo W Langer; Andreas Kjaer Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Steven G Dubois; Ethan Geier; Vandana Batra; Sook Wah Yee; John Neuhaus; Mark Segal; Daniel Martinez; Bruce Pawel; Greg Yanik; Arlene Naranjo; Wendy B London; Susan Kreissman; David Baker; Edward Attiyeh; Michael D Hogarty; John M Maris; Kathleen Giacomini; Katherine K Matthay Journal: Int J Mol Imaging Date: 2012-09-25
Authors: Emma Elizabeth Ilett; Seppo W Langer; Ingrid Holst Olsen; Birgitte Federspiel; Andreas Kjær; Ulrich Knigge Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2015-04-08
Authors: Tina Binderup; Ulrich Peter Knigge; Birgitte Federspiel; Peter Sommer; Jane Preuss Hasselby; Annika Loft; Andreas Kjaer Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2013-10-29