Literature DB >> 18196748

Comparison of 3 protocols for treatment after induction of remission in dogs with lymphoma.

Kenneth M Rassnick1, Margaret C McEntee, Hollis N Erb, Blaise P Burke, Cheryl E Balkman, Andrea B Flory, Michael A Kiselow, Karoliina Autio, Tracy L Gieger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment after inducing complete remission (CR) in dogs with lymphoma has not been established. HYPOTHESIS: After inducing CR with L-asparaginase, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone (L-CHOP); consolidation with either half-body radiation therapy (HBRT); or lomustine (CCNU) and mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone (MOPP) would improve first remission duration compared with continuing a CHOP-based protocol for an additional 4 months. ANIMALS: Dogs with stage III-V lymphoma.
METHODS: Prospective clinical trial in which dogs initially were treated with an 8-week induction protocol that consisted of L-CHOP. Dogs in CR after induction were then allocated to 1 of 2 consolidation arms. A chemotherapy consolidation arm consisted of 2 treatments with CCNU and 1 cycle of MOPP. A HBRT arm consisted of 2 sequential 8.0-Gy fractions to the cranial and caudal half-body separated by 30 days. Vincristine was given between fractions. Results of the consolidation arms also were compared with a historical group treated with the same 8-week induction protocol followed by CHOP therapy until week 24.
RESULTS: Overall, 67% of the dogs were in CR after 8 weeks of induction chemotherapy and were compared. Fifty-two dogs were in the historical arm, 23 in the CCNU/MOPP arm, and 27 in the HBRT arm. No difference in first remission duration was found among groups. Median first remission duration for the historical, CCNU/MOPP, and HBRT arms were 307, 274, and 209 days, respectively (P = .28). Overall second CR rate was 82% and was not different among groups (all P > or = .58). Overall remission duration (P = .28) and survival time (P = .48) were not different among groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Consolidation with either CCNU/MOPP or HBRT showed no advantage over a standard CHOP-based protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18196748     DOI: 10.1892/07-057.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Intern Med        ISSN: 0891-6640            Impact factor:   3.333


  9 in total

1.  Detection of retinoid receptors in non-neoplastic canine lymph nodes and in lymphoma.

Authors:  Carlos H de Mello Souza; Victor E O Valli; Barbara E Kitchell
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  The efficacy and adverse event profile of dexamethasone, melphalan, actinomycin D, and cytosine arabinoside (DMAC) chemotherapy in relapsed canine lymphoma.

Authors:  Melissa Parsons-Doherty; Valerie J Poirier; Gabrielle Monteith
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Pharmacokinetics and derivation of an anticancer dosing regimen for PAC-1, a preferential small molecule activator of procaspase-3, in healthy dogs.

Authors:  Pamela W Lucas; Joanna M Schmit; Quinn P Peterson; Diana C West; Danny C Hsu; Chris J Novotny; Levent Dirikolu; Mona I Churchwell; Daniel R Doerge; Laura D Garrett; Paul J Hergenrother; Timothy M Fan
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  Man's best friend: what can pet dogs teach us about non-Hodgkin's lymphoma?

Authors:  Kristy L Richards; Steven E Suter
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 12.988

5.  Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin and mitoxantrone in combination chemotherapy for canine lymphoma.

Authors:  Shang-Lin Wang; Jih-Jong Lee; Albert Taiching Liao
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.008

6.  Molecular profiling reveals prognostically significant subtypes of canine lymphoma.

Authors:  A M Frantz; A L Sarver; D Ito; T L Phang; A Karimpour-Fard; M C Scott; V E O Valli; K Lindblad-Toh; K E Burgess; B D Husbands; M S Henson; A Borgatti; W C Kisseberth; L E Hunter; M Breen; T D O'Brien; J F Modiano
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 2.221

7.  Evaluation of serum thymidine kinase 1 activity as a biomarker for treatment effectiveness and prediction of relapse in dogs with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Pierre Boyé; Franck Floch; François Serres; Kévyn Geeraert; Pierre Clerson; Xavier Siomboing; Mattias Bergqvist; Gabriel Sack; Dominique Tierny
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  P-Glycoprotein Activity at Diagnosis Does Not Predict Therapy Outcome and Survival in Canine B-Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Valéria Dékay; Edina Karai; András Füredi; Kornélia Szebényi; Gergely Szakács; Péter Vajdovich
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  A rare case of hepatic T-cell rich B-cell lymphoma (TCRBCL) in a juvenile dog.

Authors:  Tae-Ho Chung; Catherine Lamm; Young-Chul Choi; Jung-Woo Lee; Dohyeon Yu; Ul-Soo Choi
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 1.267

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.