OBJECTIVE: Information on prognosis for patients with cutaneous melanoma after locoregional or distant recurrence is sparse and controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze factors influencing outcome after the development of a first relapse. METHODS: Information was extracted from the Sydney Melanoma Unit database for 873 melanoma patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage I and II disease treated between 1960 and 2002 who relapsed following treatment of their primary melanoma. Clinical and pathologic factors predicting survival were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Initial presentation of recurrence was local: 95 patients (10.9%), in transit: 86 patients (9.9%), regional lymph node: 300 patients (34.4%), and distant: 392 patients (44.9%). Independent prognostic factors for survival of the 481 patients with only locoregional recurrence were type of recurrence, primary tumor ulceration, and patient age. Predictors for longer survival in the 392 patients with distant metastasis at the time of first presentation with recurrence were lung vs other sites and diagnosis of relapse after 1990 compared with diagnosis before 1980. CONCLUSIONS: The type of recurrence is the most important prognostic factor in melanoma patients who relapse. Primary tumor ulceration is the most important pathologic predictor. The results of this study suggest that management of distant metastases may have improved over the last 25 years, but many confounders and improved staging techniques make assessment of this unreliable.
OBJECTIVE: Information on prognosis for patients with cutaneous melanoma after locoregional or distant recurrence is sparse and controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze factors influencing outcome after the development of a first relapse. METHODS: Information was extracted from the Sydney Melanoma Unit database for 873 melanomapatients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage I and II disease treated between 1960 and 2002 who relapsed following treatment of their primary melanoma. Clinical and pathologic factors predicting survival were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Initial presentation of recurrence was local: 95 patients (10.9%), in transit: 86 patients (9.9%), regional lymph node: 300 patients (34.4%), and distant: 392 patients (44.9%). Independent prognostic factors for survival of the 481 patients with only locoregional recurrence were type of recurrence, primary tumor ulceration, and patient age. Predictors for longer survival in the 392 patients with distant metastasis at the time of first presentation with recurrence were lung vs other sites and diagnosis of relapse after 1990 compared with diagnosis before 1980. CONCLUSIONS: The type of recurrence is the most important prognostic factor in melanomapatients who relapse. Primary tumor ulceration is the most important pathologic predictor. The results of this study suggest that management of distant metastases may have improved over the last 25 years, but many confounders and improved staging techniques make assessment of this unreliable.
Authors: Miguel F Segura; Ilana Belitskaya-Lévy; Amy E Rose; Jan Zakrzewski; Avital Gaziel; Douglas Hanniford; Farbod Darvishian; Russell S Berman; Richard L Shapiro; Anna C Pavlick; Iman Osman; Eva Hernando Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Travis E Grotz; Svetomir N Markovic; Lori A Erickson; William S Harmsen; Marianne Huebner; David R Farley; Barbara A Pockaj; John H Donohue; Franklin H Sim; Clive S Grant; Sanjay P Bagaria; Thomas C Shives; Charles M Balch; James W Jakub Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Paolo A Ascierto; Antonio M Grimaldi; Ana Carrizosa Anderson; Carlo Bifulco; Alistair Cochran; Claus Garbe; Alexander M Eggermont; Mark Faries; Soldano Ferrone; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Thomas F Gajewski; Ruth Halaban; F Stephen Hodi; Richard Kefford; John M Kirkwood; James Larkin; Sancy Leachman; Michele Maio; Richard Marais; Giuseppe Masucci; Ignacio Melero; Giuseppe Palmieri; Igor Puzanov; Antoni Ribas; Yvonne Saenger; Bastian Schilling; Barbara Seliger; David Stroncek; Ryan Sullivan; Alessandro Testori; Ena Wang; Gennaro Ciliberto; Nicola Mozzillo; Francesco M Marincola; Magdalena Thurin Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Ting J Tu; Michelle W Ma; Stefano Monni; Amy E Rose; Herman Yee; Farbod Darvishian; David Polsky; Russell S Berman; Richard L Shapiro; Anna C Pavlick; Madhu Mazumdar; Iman Osman Journal: Oncology Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Annika M Hohnheiser; Olaf Gefeller; Jonas Göhl; Gerold Schuler; Werner Hohenberger; Susanne Merkel Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Aaron R Jeffs; Amy C Glover; Lynn J Slobbe; Li Wang; Shujie He; Jody A Hazlett; Anshul Awasthi; Adele G Woolley; Elaine S Marshall; Wayne R Joseph; Cristin G Print; Bruce C Baguley; Michael R Eccles Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 3.240