OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to test the homogeneity of the association between adverse parenting and anxiety disorders within these disorders as well as among six European countries. METHOD: Based on data from 8,232 respondents (part II sample) originating from the European study of the epidemiology of mental disorders (ESEMeD), we examined the association between three dimensions of parental rearing (care, overprotection, authoritarianism) measured by a short form of the parental bonding instrument (PBI) and anxiety disorders by computing one logistic regression model per disorder. RESULTS: A similar pattern of recalled parenting behaviour across the four anxiety disorders assessed was found, with care and overprotection having the strongest associations. There were only minor country-specific variations of this pattern. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest an association between adverse parenting and the risk of anxiety disorders in particular as well as psychiatric disorders in general that is rather non-disorder specific.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to test the homogeneity of the association between adverse parenting and anxiety disorders within these disorders as well as among six European countries. METHOD: Based on data from 8,232 respondents (part II sample) originating from the European study of the epidemiology of mental disorders (ESEMeD), we examined the association between three dimensions of parental rearing (care, overprotection, authoritarianism) measured by a short form of the parental bonding instrument (PBI) and anxiety disorders by computing one logistic regression model per disorder. RESULTS: A similar pattern of recalled parenting behaviour across the four anxiety disorders assessed was found, with care and overprotection having the strongest associations. There were only minor country-specific variations of this pattern. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest an association between adverse parenting and the risk of anxiety disorders in particular as well as psychiatric disorders in general that is rather non-disorder specific.
Authors: V Kovess-Masfety; A Boyd; J M Haro; R Bruffaerts; G Villagut; J P Lépine; I Gasquet; J Alonso Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2011-05-28 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: David Chen; O Joseph Bienvenu; Janice Krasnow; Ying Wang; Marco A Grados; Bernadette Cullen; Fernando S Goes; Brion Maher; Benjamin D Greenberg; Nicole C McLaughlin; Steven A Rasmussen; Abby J Fyer; James A Knowles; James T McCracken; John Piacentini; Dan Geller; David L Pauls; S Evelyn Stewart; Dennis L Murphy; Yin-Yao Shugart; Mark A Riddle; Gerald Nestadt; Jack Samuels Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 3.735
Authors: Takeshi Otowa; Charles O Gardner; Kenneth S Kendler; John M Hettema Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Martin A Katzman; Pierre Bleau; Pierre Blier; Pratap Chokka; Kevin Kjernisted; Michael Van Ameringen; Martin M Antony; Stéphane Bouchard; Alain Brunet; Martine Flament; Sophie Grigoriadis; Sandra Mendlowitz; Kieron O'Connor; Kiran Rabheru; Peggy M A Richter; Melisa Robichaud; John R Walker Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 3.630