Literature DB >> 18194838

Monitoring incorporation, transformation and subcellular distribution of N-l-leucyl-doxorubicin in uterine sarcoma cells using capillary electrophoretic techniques.

Yaohua Wang1, Edgar A Arriaga.   

Abstract

Previous reports have demonstrated that N-l-leucyl-doxorubicin (LeuDox) is less toxic than its parent drug, Dox, but the underlying causes of this reduced toxicity have yet to be fully elucidated. In this study, the incorporation of LeuDox into (i) the MES-SA human uterine sarcoma cell line and (ii) its Dox resistant counterpart, MES-SA/Dx5 cell line and the subsequent transformation of LeuDox into Dox and its subcellular distribution, were investigated by micellar electrokinetic chromatography with laser-induced fluorescence detection (MEKC-LIF). In both cell lines the cellular uptakes of Dox and LeuDox were similar at equimolar doses, while the percent transformation of LeuDox into Dox in MES-SA/Dx5 cells was about twice as great as its transformation in MES-SA cells, which is beneficial for reaching Dox cytotoxic levels in this resistant cell line. When both cells lines were treated with IC(35) concentrations of either Dox and LeuDox, the intracellular Dox amounts were 6-fold higher in the resistant cell line than in the sensitive cell line, suggesting that other cellular processes play a role in the cytotoxicity of Dox in the resistant cell line. The amounts and ratios of Dox and LeuDox in four subcellular fractions of LeuDox-treated MES-SA/Dx5 cells were also investigated. The highest Dox/LeuDox ratio (i.e. 2.92) was found in the nuclear fraction, followed by the ratio in the low density organelle fraction (i.e. 1.92) that contains lysosomes, organelles in which lysosomal hydrolytic enzymes, capthesins, transform LeuDox into Dox.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18194838     DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.11.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  5 in total

1.  Salinomycin sensitizes cancer cells to the effects of doxorubicin and etoposide treatment by increasing DNA damage and reducing p21 protein.

Authors:  Ju-Hwa Kim; Minji Chae; Won Ki Kim; You-Jin Kim; Han Sung Kang; Hyung Sik Kim; Sungpil Yoon
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Bioanalysis of eukaryotic organelles.

Authors:  Chad P Satori; Michelle M Henderson; Elyse A Krautkramer; Vratislav Kostal; Mark D Distefano; Mark M Distefano; Edgar A Arriaga
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Individual organelle pH determinations of magnetically enriched endocytic organelles via laser-induced fluorescence detection.

Authors:  Chad P Satori; Vratislav Kostal; Edgar A Arriaga
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 4.  The subcellular distribution of small molecules: from pharmacokinetics to synthetic biology.

Authors:  Nan Zheng; Hobart Ng Tsai; Xinyuan Zhang; Gus R Rosania
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Ultrasound-induced new cellular mechanism involved in drug resistance.

Authors:  Mariame A Hassan; Yukihiro Furusawa; Masami Minemura; Natalya Rapoport; Toshiro Sugiyama; Takashi Kondo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.