Literature DB >> 18194397

Psychometric validation of the cancer therapy satisfaction questionnaire.

Peter C Trask1, Crystal Tellefsen, Derek Espindle, Christine Getter, Ming-Ann Hsu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the domain structure and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) and the relation between the CTSQ and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).
METHODS: Three hundred sixty-one individuals with breast, colorectal, lung cancer, or melanoma who had received in the last 6 months or were currently receiving more than one cycle of chemo, biological, or hormonal therapy completed the 21-item CTSQ, with a random subsample of 88 patients completing it again 1 week later. Participants also completed quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and other self-reported questions on each occasion. Demographics, ECOG performance status, and clinical information were collected. CTSQ responses were submitted to multitrait analyses and exploratory factor analysis. Psychometric properties and the correlations between the CTSQ and the Quality of Life Questionnaire -- Core 30 (QLQ-C30) were evaluated.
RESULTS: Analyses revealed three domains with good psychometric properties: Feelings about Side Effects, Satisfaction with Therapy, and Expectations of Therapy. Correlations with the QLQ-C30 domains were low to moderate.
CONCLUSION: The CTSQ is a newly developed 16-item patient-reported measure with strong psychometric properties and constructs not captured by the QLQ-C30. It can be used to evaluate cancer patients' experiences with intravenous and/or oral chemo, biological, and hormonal therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18194397     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00310.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  18 in total

1.  Development of a Korean version of the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ): cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  So Jeong Park; Soo Min An; Se Hyun Kim
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Greater treatment satisfaction in patients receiving daratumumab subcutaneous vs. intravenous for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: COLUMBA clinical trial results.

Authors:  Saad Z Usmani; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Vania Hungria; Shinsuke Iida; Nizar J Bahlis; Hareth Nahi; Hila Magen; Michele Cavo; Cyrille Hulin; Darrell White; Valerio De Stefano; John Fastenau; Mary Slavcev; Christoph Heuck; Xiang Qin; Huiling Pei; Tara Masterson; Kristen Lantz; Katharine S Gries
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 3.  Pazopanib in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  David Cella; Jennifer L Beaumont
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2016-02

4.  Validation of the State Version Questionnaire on Autonomic Regulation (State-aR) for cancer patients.

Authors:  M Kröz; F Schad; M Reif; H B von Laue; G Feder; R Zerm; S N Willich; M Girke; B Brinkhaus
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.175

5.  Measuring cancer care coordination: development and validation of a questionnaire for patients.

Authors:  Jane M Young; Jennifer Walsh; Phyllis N Butow; Michael J Solomon; Joanne Shaw
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Reliability and validity of the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire in lung cancer.

Authors:  K Cheung; M de Mol; S Visser; B L Den Oudsten; B H Stricker; J G J V Aerts
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Are we missing the Institute of Medicine's mark? A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures assessing quality of patient-centred cancer care.

Authors:  Flora Tzelepis; Shiho K Rose; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Tara Clinton-McHarg; Mariko L Carey; Christine L Paul
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): association of treatment satisfaction, negative medication experience and treatment restrictions with health outcomes, from the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Ishan Hirji; Shaloo Gupta; Amir Goren; Diana R Chirovsky; Alyson B Moadel; Eduardo Olavarria; Timothy W Victor; Catherine C Davis
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  What Causes Care Coordination Problems? A Case for Microanalysis.

Authors:  Wayne Zachary; Russell Charles Maulitz; Drew A Zachary
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2016-08-01

10.  Validation of a treatment satisfaction questionnaire in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: assessing the change from intravenous to subcutaneous administration of rituximab.

Authors:  Christina Theodore-Oklota; Louise Humphrey; Christof Wiesner; Gabriel Schnetzler; Stacie Hudgens; Alicyn Campbell
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.