Literature DB >> 18194286

'Confidentiality smokescreens' and carers for people with mental health problems: the perspectives of professionals.

Ben Gray1, Catherine Robinson, Diane Seddon, Angela Roberts.   

Abstract

This paper reports on some of the findings from a collaborative study funded by the Big Lottery and led by Crossroads Caring for Carers about carers for people with mental health problems. The protection and use of information in mental health are firmly rooted in ethics and professional codes, law and policy, as well as values and professional practice. While government initiatives have attempted to augment the role and rights of carers, policy guidance involving information sharing between professionals and carers has failed to deal with the practical dilemmas of patient confidentiality. Professional codes and training neither explore nor develop the moral and ethical ground that stands between the service user's need for privacy and the carer's need for information. Policy and training guidance on confidentiality is scattered, ambiguous, confusing for professionals and inconsistent. There is uncertainty in practice about the information that professionals may share, and many professionals do not take into account carers' rights, not least to basic information to help them care for service users. 'Confidentiality smokescreens' may sometimes lead to information being withheld from carers. Professionals sometimes find it easier and safer to say nothing. In order to explore these issues from the perspectives of professionals, 65 participants were interviewed. The sample included directors and senior staff from the health, social care and voluntary sectors. Respondents were asked to comment at length on their understanding of confidentiality and information sharing with carers. Findings highlight confidentiality smokescreens that erect barriers that limit effective information sharing; issues involving confidentiality, risk management and carers in crisis; examples of good practice; and the need for the training of professionals on confidentiality issues and the rights of carers. This paper explores the challenge of confidentiality smokescreens from the perspective of professionals, and draws out implications for professional practice and training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18194286     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00748.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  10 in total

1.  Involving carers in risk assessment: a study of a structured dialogue between mental health nurses and carers.

Authors:  Haley Jackson; Jane Wray; Eric Gardiner; Tracy Flanagan
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2019-08-08

2.  Mental health professionals and information sharing: carer perspectives.

Authors:  L S Wilson; D Pillay; B D Kelly; P Casey
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Key working for families with young disabled children.

Authors:  Bernie Carter; Megan Thomas
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2011-07-21

4.  Psychiatric Worker and Family Members: Pathways Towards Co-Operation Networks within Psychiatric Assistance Services.

Authors:  Silvia Carbone
Journal:  Ment Illn       Date:  2014-03-04

5.  How to make carer involvement in mental health inpatient units happen: a focus group study with patients, carers and clinicians.

Authors:  Domenico Giacco; Aysegul Dirik; Justina Kaselionyte; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  "It's a matter of building bridges…" - feasibility of a carer involvement intervention for inpatients with severe mental illness.

Authors:  Justina Kaselionyte; Maev Conneely; Domenico Giacco
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Peer supported Open Dialogue in the National Health Service: implementing and evaluating a new approach to Mental Health Care.

Authors:  Catherine Kinane; James Osborne; Yasmin Ishaq; Marcus Colman; Douglas MacInnes
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Improvement of care for the physical health of patients with severe mental illness: a qualitative study assessing the view of patients and families.

Authors:  Fenneke M van Hasselt; Marian J T Oud; Anton J M Loonen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  Why involve families in acute mental healthcare? A collaborative conceptual review.

Authors:  Aysegul Dirik; Sima Sandhu; Domenico Giacco; Katherine Barrett; Gerry Bennison; Sue Collinson; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Defining what a 'carer' is and the role they play in in-patient mental healthcare: A focus group study with patients, carers and clinicians.

Authors:  Aysegul Dirik; Justina Kaselionyte; Domenico Giacco; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2020-08-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.