Literature DB >> 18194061

Decision making and learning while taking sequential risks.

Timothy J Pleskac1.   

Abstract

A sequential risk-taking paradigm used to identify real-world risk takers invokes both learning and decision processes. This article expands the paradigm to a larger class of tasks with different stochastic environments and different learning requirements. Generalizing a Bayesian sequential risk-taking model to the larger set of tasks clarifies the roles of learning and decision making during sequential risky choice. Results show that respondents adapt their learning processes and associated mental representations of the task to the stochastic environment. Furthermore, their Bayesian learning processes are shown to interfere with the paradigm's identification of risky drug use, whereas the decision-making process facilitates its diagnosticity. Theoretical implications of the results in terms of both understanding risk-taking behavior and improving risk-taking assessment methods are discussed. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18194061     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  28 in total

1.  Similar Processes Despite Divergent Behavior in Two Commonly Used Measures of Risky Decision Making.

Authors:  Anthony J Bishara; Timothy J Pleskac; Daniel J Fridberg; Eldad Yechiam; Jesolyn Lucas; Jerome R Busemeyer; Peter R Finn; Julie C Stout
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2009-10

2.  Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research.

Authors:  Anna Dreber; Thomas Pfeiffer; Johan Almenberg; Siri Isaksson; Brad Wilson; Yiling Chen; Brian A Nosek; Magnus Johannesson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Decision from Models: Generalizing Probability Information to Novel Tasks.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; Jacienta T Paily; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2015-01

4.  Predicting risk decisions in a modified Balloon Analogue Risk Task: Conventional and single-trial ERP analyses.

Authors:  Ruolei Gu; Dandan Zhang; Yi Luo; Hongyan Wang; Lucas S Broster
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Applying novel technologies and methods to inform the ontology of self-regulation.

Authors:  Ian W Eisenberg; Patrick G Bissett; Jessica R Canning; Jesse Dallery; A Zeynep Enkavi; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Oscar Gonzalez; Alan I Green; Mary Ann Greene; Michaela Kiernan; Sunny Jung Kim; Jamie Li; Michael R Lowe; Gina L Mazza; Stephen A Metcalf; Lisa Onken; Sadev S Parikh; Ellen Peters; Judith J Prochaska; Emily A Scherer; Luke E Stoeckel; Matthew J Valente; Jialing Wu; Haiyi Xie; David P MacKinnon; Lisa A Marsch; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2017-10-05

6.  Behavioral preference in sequential decision-making and its association with anxiety.

Authors:  Dandan Zhang; Ruolei Gu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Tuning the Brake While Raising the Stake: Network Dynamics during Sequential Decision-Making.

Authors:  David Meder; Brian Numelin Haagensen; Oliver Hulme; Tobias Morville; Sofie Gelskov; Damian Marc Herz; Beata Diomsina; Mark Schram Christensen; Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Mind the gap: bridging economic and naturalistic risk-taking with cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Tom Schonberg; Craig R Fox; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  An Overview of Judgment and Decision Making Research Through the Lens of Fuzzy Trace Theory.

Authors:  Roni Setton; Evan Wilhelms; Becky Weldon; Christina Chick; Valerie Reyna
Journal:  Xin Li Ke Xue Jin Zhan       Date:  2014-12

10.  Risk-taking and decision-making in youth: relationships to addiction vulnerability.

Authors:  Kornelia N Balogh; Linda C Mayes; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 6.756

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.