BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Elucidation of molecular basis of the adenomatous polyps (AP) and colorectal cancer (CRC) development is crucial for their prevention, early detection, and treatment. According to the recent discoveries, sulfatases are implied in extracellular matrix remodeling and degradation and also in the regulation of certain signaling pathways. However, their exact role in carcinogenesis remains unclear. Because the majority of CRCs arise from AP, the aim of our studies was the investigation of sulfatase activity in adenomas and adenocarcinomas and verification of possible usefulness of sulfatase activity determination as an indicator of the presence and discrimination between adenomas and carcinomas. PATIENT- METHODS: One hundred twenty individuals were enrolled in the study. We assayed serum sulfatase activity in 79 patients with colorectal neoplasms (38 CRC and 41 AP) and 41 controls. Enzyme activity was determined colorimetrically. RESULTS: We found statistically higher serum sulfatase activity in patients with colonic neoplasms than in controls (124; 112-139 vs. 79.5; 73-87 U). The activity was more elevated in adenomas (149; 128-173 U) than in cancers (103; 90-112 U). Sulfatase activity exceeded the cutoff value in 71% of AP and 47% of CRC patients. It increased with number of adenomas and tended to decrease with tumor progression. CONCLUSIONS: Sulfatases seem to be involved in the early stages of colonic neoplastic transformation which is reflected in their serum activity. The likelihood of elevated sulfatase activity is almost ten times higher in subjects with than without polyps. Sulfatase upregulation in majority of adenomas and their correlation tendencies warrants reconsideration of sulfatase determination as a possible diagnostic tool.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Elucidation of molecular basis of the adenomatous polyps (AP) and colorectal cancer (CRC) development is crucial for their prevention, early detection, and treatment. According to the recent discoveries, sulfatases are implied in extracellular matrix remodeling and degradation and also in the regulation of certain signaling pathways. However, their exact role in carcinogenesis remains unclear. Because the majority of CRCs arise from AP, the aim of our studies was the investigation of sulfatase activity in adenomas and adenocarcinomas and verification of possible usefulness of sulfatase activity determination as an indicator of the presence and discrimination between adenomas and carcinomas. PATIENT- METHODS: One hundred twenty individuals were enrolled in the study. We assayed serum sulfatase activity in 79 patients with colorectal neoplasms (38 CRC and 41 AP) and 41 controls. Enzyme activity was determined colorimetrically. RESULTS: We found statistically higher serum sulfatase activity in patients with colonic neoplasms than in controls (124; 112-139 vs. 79.5; 73-87 U). The activity was more elevated in adenomas (149; 128-173 U) than in cancers (103; 90-112 U). Sulfatase activity exceeded the cutoff value in 71% of AP and 47% of CRC patients. It increased with number of adenomas and tended to decrease with tumor progression. CONCLUSIONS: Sulfatases seem to be involved in the early stages of colonic neoplastic transformation which is reflected in their serum activity. The likelihood of elevated sulfatase activity is almost ten times higher in subjects with than without polyps. Sulfatase upregulation in majority of adenomas and their correlation tendencies warrants reconsideration of sulfatase determination as a possible diagnostic tool.
Authors: Junsheng Li; Jörg Kleeff; Ivane Abiatari; Hany Kayed; Nathalia A Giese; Klaus Felix; Thomas Giese; Markus W Büchler; Helmut Friess Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2005-04-07 Impact factor: 27.401
Authors: R A Wagenaar-Miller; G Hanley; R Shattuck-Brandt; R N DuBois; R L Bell; L M Matrisian; D W Morgan Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2003-05-06 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Oscar J Cordero; Monica Imbernon; Loretta De Chiara; Vicenta S Martinez-Zorzano; Daniel Ayude; Maria Paez de la Cadena; F Javier Rodriguez-Berrocal Journal: World J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-06-10
Authors: Loretta De Chiara; Ana M Rodríguez-Piñeiro; Francisco J Rodríguez-Berrocal; Oscar J Cordero; David Martínez-Ares; María Páez de la Cadena Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-06-28 Impact factor: 4.430