BACKGROUND: Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (DCM) are at high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD). However, the predictive value of prophylactic implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) in this patient cohort is yet unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Whether NT pro BNP levels and/or reproducible non sustained ventricular tachycardias (NSVTs) are predictive for SCD was prospectively tested in 30 patients with DCM and LVEF </= 40%. All patients received Holter-recordings (HR) on three consecutive days and baseline NT-pro BNP levels were determined. Patients were followed for occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias or unexplained syncope. A great degree of variability was found regarding the occurrence of NSVTs (10% had NSVTs in two consecutive HR, 10% in three consecutive HR, 30% in one HR and 50% had no NSVTs). Patients with NSVTs in more than one HR had significantly higher NT-pro BNP levels (first quartile: 715 pg/ml, median 2,176 pg/ml, third quartile 5,755 pg/ml vs. first quartile 273 pg/ml, median 566 pg/ml, third quartile 1,350 pg/ml, P = 0.0388). During a mean follow-up of 21.6 +/- 1.2 months patients with an arrhythmic event had significantly higher NT-pro BNP levels than patients without event (first quartile: 1,002 pg/ml, median 4,075 pg/ml, third quartile 7,777 pg/ml vs. first quartile 173 pg/ml, median 267 pg/ml, third quartile 1,220 pg/ml, P = 0.0135). NT-pro BNP levels of 2,259 pg/ml were identified as optimal cut-off value for the prediction of arrhythmic events (P = 0.0313). In contrast reproducible NSVTs were not predictive for arrhythmic events (P = 0.0960). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that in patients with DCM the value of reproducible NSVTs in predicting arrhythmic events is low. In contrast raised NT-pro BNP levels significantly correlated with occurrence of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias. Larger prospective trials are required to confirm these results.
BACKGROUND:Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (DCM) are at high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD). However, the predictive value of prophylactic implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) in this patient cohort is yet unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Whether NT pro BNP levels and/or reproducible non sustained ventricular tachycardias (NSVTs) are predictive for SCD was prospectively tested in 30 patients with DCM and LVEF </= 40%. All patients received Holter-recordings (HR) on three consecutive days and baseline NT-pro BNP levels were determined. Patients were followed for occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias or unexplained syncope. A great degree of variability was found regarding the occurrence of NSVTs (10% had NSVTs in two consecutive HR, 10% in three consecutive HR, 30% in one HR and 50% had no NSVTs). Patients with NSVTs in more than one HR had significantly higher NT-pro BNP levels (first quartile: 715 pg/ml, median 2,176 pg/ml, third quartile 5,755 pg/ml vs. first quartile 273 pg/ml, median 566 pg/ml, third quartile 1,350 pg/ml, P = 0.0388). During a mean follow-up of 21.6 +/- 1.2 months patients with an arrhythmic event had significantly higher NT-pro BNP levels than patients without event (first quartile: 1,002 pg/ml, median 4,075 pg/ml, third quartile 7,777 pg/ml vs. first quartile 173 pg/ml, median 267 pg/ml, third quartile 1,220 pg/ml, P = 0.0135). NT-pro BNP levels of 2,259 pg/ml were identified as optimal cut-off value for the prediction of arrhythmic events (P = 0.0313). In contrast reproducible NSVTs were not predictive for arrhythmic events (P = 0.0960). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that in patients with DCM the value of reproducible NSVTs in predicting arrhythmic events is low. In contrast raised NT-pro BNP levels significantly correlated with occurrence of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias. Larger prospective trials are required to confirm these results.
Authors: R Klingenberg; C Zugck; R Becker; D Schellberg; G Heinze; R Kell; A Remppis; W Schoels; H A Katus; T J Dengler Journal: Heart Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Dietmar Bänsch; Matthias Antz; Sigrid Boczor; Marius Volkmer; Jürgen Tebbenjohanns; Karlheinz Seidl; Michael Block; Frank Gietzen; Jürgen Berger; Karl Heinz Kuck Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-03-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Julia C Senges; Ruediger Becker; Kirsten D Schreiner; Alexander Bauer; Slawomir Weretka; Karl Siegler; Wolfgang Kuebler; Wolfgang Schoels Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Gust H Bardy; Kerry L Lee; Daniel B Mark; Jeanne E Poole; Douglas L Packer; Robin Boineau; Michael Domanski; Charles Troutman; Jill Anderson; George Johnson; Steven E McNulty; Nancy Clapp-Channing; Linda D Davidson-Ray; Elizabeth S Fraulo; Daniel P Fishbein; Richard M Luceri; John H Ip Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-01-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A J Moss; W J Hall; D S Cannom; J P Daubert; S L Higgins; H Klein; J H Levine; S Saksena; A L Waldo; D Wilber; M W Brown; M Heo Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-12-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rüdiger Becker; Markus Haass; Dirk Ick; Carsten Krueger; Alexander Bauer; Julia C Senges-Becker; Frederik Voss; Thomas Hilbel; Feraydoon Niroomand; Hugo A Katus; Wolfgang Schoels Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Alan Kadish; Alan Dyer; James P Daubert; Rebecca Quigg; N A Mark Estes; Kelley P Anderson; Hugh Calkins; David Hoch; Jeffrey Goldberger; Alaa Shalaby; William E Sanders; Andi Schaechter; Joseph H Levine Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-05-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amir M Nia; Natig Gassanov; Kristina M Dahlem; Evren Caglayan; Martin Hellmich; Erland Erdmann; Fikret Er Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2011-05-03 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: David M Leistner; Jens Klotsche; Lars Pieper; Sylvia Palm; Günter K Stalla; Hendrik Lehnert; Sigmund Silber; Winfried März; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen; Andreas M Zeiher Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2013-01-04 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Olaf Schulz; Andre Rudolph; Sarah Scheiner; Helena Mut; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Gunnar Berghoefer; Ricarda Bensch; Jochen Kraemer; Ingolf Schimke Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2010-09-02 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Tiina Marjatta Salo; Jan Sundell; Juhani Knuuti; Jukka Kemppainen; Kira Stolen; Pirjo Nuutila; Timo H Mäkikallio; Heikki V Huikuri; K E Juhani Airaksinen Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 5.460