PURPOSE: This study sought to compare iodine-124 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (124I-PET/CT) and 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D: -glucose- (FDG-) PET in the detection of recurrent differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) lesions in patients with increasing serum thyroglobulin (Tg), Tg-antibodies, or both, but without pathological cervical ultrasonography. We assessed the lesion detection accuracy of 124I-PET alone, CT alone, (124)I-PET/CT, FDG-PET, and all these modalities combined. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 21 patients (9 follicular, 12 papillary DTC) who had been rendered disease-free by thyroidectomy and radioiodine treatment (RIT) and followed up for 21-275 months after the last RIT. In all patients, FDG-PET was performed first. Within 1 week, 124I-PET/CT was performed 24 h after oral administration of 43 +/- 11 MBq 124I. Imaging results were correlated with further clinical follow-up with (n = 12) or without (n = 9) post-study histology as the reference standard. RESULTS: The sensitivities for DTC lesion detection were: 124I-PET, 49%; CT, 67%; 124I-PET/CT, 80%; FDG-PET, 70%; and all modalities combined, 91%. For local recurrences (distant metastases), the sensitivities were: 124I-PET, 60% (45%); CT, 20% (84%); and FDG-PET, 65% (71%). One-third of lesions demonstrated pathological tracer uptake with both 124I- and FDG-PET, while two-thirds were positive with only one of these modalities. CONCLUSION: Used together, 124I-PET and CT allow localization of foci of highly specific 124I uptake as well as non-iodine-avid lesions. The combination of 124I-PET/CT and FDG-PET improves restaging in recurrent DTC by enabling detection on whole-body scans of local recurrence or metastases that are often not found if only one of the methods or other imaging modalities are applied.
PURPOSE: This study sought to compare iodine-124 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (124I-PET/CT) and 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D: -glucose- (FDG-) PET in the detection of recurrent differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) lesions in patients with increasing serum thyroglobulin (Tg), Tg-antibodies, or both, but without pathological cervical ultrasonography. We assessed the lesion detection accuracy of 124I-PET alone, CT alone, (124)I-PET/CT, FDG-PET, and all these modalities combined. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 21 patients (9 follicular, 12 papillary DTC) who had been rendered disease-free by thyroidectomy and radioiodine treatment (RIT) and followed up for 21-275 months after the last RIT. In all patients, FDG-PET was performed first. Within 1 week, 124I-PET/CT was performed 24 h after oral administration of 43 +/- 11 MBq 124I. Imaging results were correlated with further clinical follow-up with (n = 12) or without (n = 9) post-study histology as the reference standard. RESULTS: The sensitivities for DTC lesion detection were: 124I-PET, 49%; CT, 67%; 124I-PET/CT, 80%; FDG-PET, 70%; and all modalities combined, 91%. For local recurrences (distant metastases), the sensitivities were: 124I-PET, 60% (45%); CT, 20% (84%); and FDG-PET, 65% (71%). One-third of lesions demonstrated pathological tracer uptake with both 124I- and FDG-PET, while two-thirds were positive with only one of these modalities. CONCLUSION: Used together, 124I-PET and CT allow localization of foci of highly specific 124I uptake as well as non-iodine-avid lesions. The combination of 124I-PET/CT and FDG-PET improves restaging in recurrent DTC by enabling detection on whole-body scans of local recurrence or metastases that are often not found if only one of the methods or other imaging modalities are applied.
Authors: Walter Jentzen; Lutz Freudenberg; Ernst G Eising; Melanie Heinze; Wolfgang Brandau; Andreas Bockisch Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Robert C Smallridge; Shon E Meek; Melissa A Morgan; Geoffrey S Gates; Thomas P Fox; Stefan Grebe; Vahab Fatourechi Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2006-10-31 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: M Dietlein; J Dressler; J Farahati; F Grünwald; B Leisner; E Moser; C Reiners; H Schicha; O Schober Journal: Nuklearmedizin Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 1.379
Authors: L S Freudenberg; G Antoch; W Jentzen; R Pink; J Knust; R Görges; S P Müller; A Bockisch; J F Debatin; W Brandau Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2004-06-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: L S Freudenberg; G Antoch; R Görges; J Knust; R Pink; W Jentzen; J F Debatin; W Brandau; A Bockisch; J Stattaus Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Lutz S Freudenberg; Walter Jentzen; Alexander Stahl; Andreas Bockisch; Sandra J Rosenbaum-Krumme Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Laurent Dercle; Désirée Deandreis; Marie Terroir; Sophie Leboulleux; Jean Lumbroso; Martin Schlumberger Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: N Muñoz Pérez; J M Villar del Moral; M A Muros Fuentes; M López de la Torre; J I Arcelus Martínez; P Becerra Massare; D Esteva Martínez; M Cañadas Garre; E Coll Del Rey; P Bueno Laraño; J A Ferrón Orihuela Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2013-04-28 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Henning Dralle; Thomas J Musholt; Jochen Schabram; Thomas Steinmüller; Andreja Frilling; Dietmar Simon; Peter E Goretzki; Bruno Niederle; Christian Scheuba; Thomas Clerici; Michael Hermann; Jochen Kußmann; Kerstin Lorenz; Christoph Nies; Peter Schabram; Arnold Trupka; Andreas Zielke; Wolfram Karges; Markus Luster; Kurt W Schmid; Dirk Vordermark; Hans-Joachim Schmoll; Reinhard Mühlenberg; Otmar Schober; Harald Rimmele; Andreas Machens Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2013-03-03 Impact factor: 3.445