OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify biomarkers in sera of pancreatic cancer patients using mass spectrometry (MS) approaches. METHODS: Sera from patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and sera from normal volunteers were subjected to gel electrophoresis to resolve and quantify differences in protein levels. Protein bands that differed quantitatively were digested with trypsin, and peptides were identified by electrospray ionization (ESI) ion-trap tandem MS. Mass spectra were also collected directly from pancreatic cancer sera as well as healthy control sera using ESI-MS. RESULTS: Three large-mass proteins were found to be elevated in pancreatic cancer sera versus normal sera, alpha-2 macroglobulin, ceruloplasmin, and complement 3C. Complement 3C is a major regulator of inflammatory responses. The ESI-MS of human pancreatic cancer sera versus normal sera revealed greater heterogeneity in cancer sera than control sera, especially in the low-mass region. Bootstrapping statistical analysis identified 20 low-mass serum peaks that correlated with control sera and 20 different peaks that correlated with pancreatic cancer sera. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that inflammation-sensitive proteins were identified as increased in pancreatic cancer sera supports the hypothesis that inflammatory-driven processes are involved in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Liquid ESI-MS analyses of sera hold promise for future pancreatic cancer blood tests as well as for understanding mechanisms of pancreatic carcinogenesis. The variability observed between the low-mass regions of normal versus pancreatic cancer spectra may aid in diagnosis and therapy.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify biomarkers in sera of pancreatic cancerpatients using mass spectrometry (MS) approaches. METHODS: Sera from patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and sera from normal volunteers were subjected to gel electrophoresis to resolve and quantify differences in protein levels. Protein bands that differed quantitatively were digested with trypsin, and peptides were identified by electrospray ionization (ESI) ion-trap tandem MS. Mass spectra were also collected directly from pancreatic cancer sera as well as healthy control sera using ESI-MS. RESULTS: Three large-mass proteins were found to be elevated in pancreatic cancer sera versus normal sera, alpha-2 macroglobulin, ceruloplasmin, and complement 3C. Complement 3C is a major regulator of inflammatory responses. The ESI-MS of humanpancreatic cancer sera versus normal sera revealed greater heterogeneity in cancer sera than control sera, especially in the low-mass region. Bootstrapping statistical analysis identified 20 low-mass serum peaks that correlated with control sera and 20 different peaks that correlated with pancreatic cancer sera. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that inflammation-sensitive proteins were identified as increased in pancreatic cancer sera supports the hypothesis that inflammatory-driven processes are involved in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Liquid ESI-MS analyses of sera hold promise for future pancreatic cancer blood tests as well as for understanding mechanisms of pancreatic carcinogenesis. The variability observed between the low-mass regions of normal versus pancreatic cancer spectra may aid in diagnosis and therapy.
Authors: James R Hocker; Russell G Postier; Min Li; Megan R Lerner; Stan A Lightfoot; Marvin D Peyton; Subrato J Deb; Candace M Baker; Travis L Williams; Rushie Jane Hanas; Donald E Stowell; Theresa J Lander; Daniel J Brackett; Jay S Hanas Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Jay S Hanas; James R Hocker; Govindan Ramajayam; Vasudevan Prabhakaran; Vedantam Rajshekhar; Anna Oommen; Josephine J Manoj; Michael P Anderson; Douglas A Drevets; Hélène Carabin Journal: Exp Parasitol Date: 2018-08-08 Impact factor: 2.011
Authors: Edimara S Reis; Dimitrios C Mastellos; Daniel Ricklin; Alberto Mantovani; John D Lambris Journal: Nat Rev Immunol Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 53.106
Authors: Shalini Makawita; Chris Smith; Ihor Batruch; Yingye Zheng; Felix Rückert; Robert Grützmann; Christian Pilarsky; Steven Gallinger; Eleftherios P Diamandis Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Lynn M Amon; Wendy Law; Matthew P Fitzgibbon; Jennifer A Gross; Kathy O'Briant; Amelia Peterson; Charles Drescher; Daniel B Martin; Martin McIntosh Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: A Xue; C J Scarlett; L Chung; G Butturini; A Scarpa; R Gandy; S R Wilson; R C Baxter; R C Smith Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: James R Hocker; Altaf Mohammed; Christopher E Aston; Misty Brewer; Stan A Lightfoot; Chinthalapally V Rao; Jay S Hanas Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 7.396