OBJECTIVE: The present study assessed the impact of unfavourable vascular anatomy on the feasibility and safety of carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). METHODS: Between 2000 and 2005, 154 CAS procedures (46% in symptomatics) were performed in 138 consecutive patients (mean age 72 +/- 7 years, 63% males), followed for a median period of 16 months by a neurologist performing clinical and duplex scan examination. The impact on outcome of tortuous supra-aortic vessels, tortuous internal carotid artery (ICA), calcified stenosis and contralateral ICA occlusion were assessed. RESULTS: The feasibility was 100%. The 1-month rate of death and disabling stroke was 2.6% (1.2% in the asymptomatic group and 4.2% in symptomatic group, P = 0.33). The 1-month rate of any stroke and death was 4.5%. During follow-up, a further seven events occurred (one ipsilateral major stroke, one ipsilateral minor stroke and five deaths). There was no difference in occurrence of any event during follow-up between asymptomatic and symptomatic group (8.4% versus 9.6%, P = 0.78). At least one unfavourable vascular anatomy condition was present in 48% of cases, two conditions in 16% and three in 3%. No statistically significant association was found between unfavourable vascular anatomy and outcome. Intra-stent restenosis was registered by duplex scan in five cases (3.2%); it was associated with occurrence of minor stroke during follow-up (P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: CAS as first choice procedure is feasible, safe and effective, despite hostile vascular anatomy may be encountered in some patients. Unfavourable anatomic conditions appear to have a scarce impact on outcome.
OBJECTIVE: The present study assessed the impact of unfavourable vascular anatomy on the feasibility and safety of carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). METHODS: Between 2000 and 2005, 154 CAS procedures (46% in symptomatics) were performed in 138 consecutive patients (mean age 72 +/- 7 years, 63% males), followed for a median period of 16 months by a neurologist performing clinical and duplex scan examination. The impact on outcome of tortuous supra-aortic vessels, tortuous internal carotid artery (ICA), calcified stenosis and contralateral ICA occlusion were assessed. RESULTS: The feasibility was 100%. The 1-month rate of death and disabling stroke was 2.6% (1.2% in the asymptomatic group and 4.2% in symptomatic group, P = 0.33). The 1-month rate of any stroke and death was 4.5%. During follow-up, a further seven events occurred (one ipsilateral major stroke, one ipsilateral minor stroke and five deaths). There was no difference in occurrence of any event during follow-up between asymptomatic and symptomatic group (8.4% versus 9.6%, P = 0.78). At least one unfavourable vascular anatomy condition was present in 48% of cases, two conditions in 16% and three in 3%. No statistically significant association was found between unfavourable vascular anatomy and outcome. Intra-stent restenosis was registered by duplex scan in five cases (3.2%); it was associated with occurrence of minor stroke during follow-up (P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: CAS as first choice procedure is feasible, safe and effective, despite hostile vascular anatomy may be encountered in some patients. Unfavourable anatomic conditions appear to have a scarce impact on outcome.