Literature DB >> 18192667

Response functions for computing absorbed dose to skeletal tissues from photon irradiation.

K F Eckerman1, W E Bolch, M Zankl, N Petoussi-Henss.   

Abstract

The calculation of absorbed dose in skeletal tissues at radiogenic risk has been a difficult problem because the relevant structures cannot be represented in conventional geometric terms nor can they be visualised in the tomographic image data used to define the computational models of the human body. The active marrow, the tissue of concern in leukaemia induction, is present within the spongiosa regions of trabecular bone, whereas the osteoprogenitor cells at risk for bone cancer induction are considered to be within the soft tissues adjacent to the mineral surfaces. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommends averaging the absorbed energy over the active marrow within the spongiosa and over the soft tissues within 10 microm of the mineral surface for leukaemia and bone cancer induction, respectively. In its forthcoming recommendation, it is expected that the latter guidance will be changed to include soft tissues within 50 microm of the mineral surfaces. To address the computational problems, the skeleton of the proposed ICRP reference computational phantom has been subdivided to identify those voxels associated with cortical shell, spongiosa and the medullary cavity of the long bones. It is further proposed that the Monte Carlo calculations with these phantoms compute the energy deposition in the skeletal target tissues as the product of the particle fluence in the skeletal subdivisions and applicable fluence-to-dose-response functions. This paper outlines the development of such response functions for photons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18192667     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncm468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  8 in total

1.  The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners.

Authors:  Adam C Turner; Maria Zankl; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Di Zhang; Erin Angel; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Response functions for computing absorbed dose to skeletal tissues from photon irradiation--an update.

Authors:  Perry B Johnson; Amir A Bahadori; Keith F Eckerman; Choonsik Lee; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Carl D Elliston; Andrew E Arai; Marcus Y Chen; Richard Mather; Gregory D N Pearson; Robert L Delapaz; Edward Nickoloff; Ajoy Dutta; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Sample size requirements for estimating effective dose from computed tomography using solid-state metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor dosimetry.

Authors:  Sigal Trattner; Bin Cheng; Radoslaw L Pieniazek; Udo Hoffmann; Pamela S Douglas; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Estimating Effective Dose of Radiation From Pediatric Cardiac CT Angiography Using a 64-MDCT Scanner: New Conversion Factors Relating Dose-Length Product to Effective Dose.

Authors:  Sigal Trattner; Anjali Chelliah; Peter Prinsen; Carrie B Ruzal-Shapiro; Yanping Xu; Sachin Jambawalikar; Maxwell Amurao; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Cardiac-Specific Conversion Factors to Estimate Radiation Effective Dose From Dose-Length Product in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Sigal Trattner; Sandra Halliburton; Carla M Thompson; Yanping Xu; Anjali Chelliah; Sachin R Jambawalikar; Boyu Peng; M Robert Peters; Jill E Jacobs; Munir Ghesani; James J Jang; Hussein Al-Khalidi; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-08-16

7.  Repeated exposure to neurotoxic levels of chlorpyrifos alters hippocampal expression of neurotrophins and neuropeptides.

Authors:  Young S Lee; John A Lewis; Danielle L Ippolito; Naissan Hussainzada; Pamela J Lein; David A Jackson; Jonathan D Stallings
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.221

8.  Response functions for computing absorbed dose to skeletal tissues from neutron irradiation.

Authors:  Amir A Bahadori; Perry Johnson; Derek W Jokisch; Keith F Eckerman; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.