Literature DB >> 18192471

Percutaneous image-guided splenic biopsy in the oncology patient: an audit of 156 consecutive cases.

Alda Tam1, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Edmund P Pillsbury, Joe E Ensor, Sanjay Gupta, Ravi Murthy, Kamran Ahrar, Michael J Wallace, Marshall E Hicks, David C Madoff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous image-guided splenic biopsy in patients known to have or suspected of having malignancy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from all image-guided splenic biopsies performed at a single institution from January 1992 to March 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred fifty-six splenic biopsies were performed in 147 patients (78 male and 69 female patients; mean age, 54.9 years; age range, 13-81 years). The most common indications for biopsy were suspected recurrent lymphoma (n = 101, 64.7%), suspected metastatic disease (n = 39, 25%), and unknown diagnosis (n = 16, 10.3%). All biopsies were performed with computed tomographic (n = 86), ultrasonographic (n = 68), or fluoroscopic (n = 2) guidance. Most biopsies (91%) were performed with 22-gauge needles, with a mean of 2.8 passes. The mean lesion size was 3.2 cm (range, 0.8-13 cm). Final diagnosis was confirmed with splenectomy (n = 39), histopathologic correlation with concurrent biopsy or surgical specimen (n = 52), or clinical or imaging follow-up ranging from 2 weeks to 14 years (n = 44). Complications were recorded.
RESULTS: Sufficient tissue for pathologic analysis was obtained in 144 of the 156 biopsies (diagnostic yield, 92.3%). The overall sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 83.4%, 87.8%, and 84.7%, respectively. Complications occurred in 26 biopsies (16.7%), with a 1.9% (n = 3) major complication rate and a 14.7% (n = 23) minor complication rate. Splenectomy was necessary in two patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Splenic biopsy in the evaluation of new or recurrent neoplasm is a minimally invasive procedure with low complication rates and a high diagnostic yield.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18192471     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.08.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  8 in total

Review 1.  Image-guided percutaneous splenic biopsy and drainage.

Authors:  Jennifer Sammon; Maria Twomey; Lee Crush; Michael M Maher; Owen J O'Connor
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  The value of contrast-enhanced dynamic and diffusion-weighted MR imaging for distinguishing benign and malignant splenic masses.

Authors:  Seo-Youn Choi; Seong Hyun Kim; Kyung Mi Jang; Tae Wook Kang; Kyoung Doo Song; Ji Yoon Moon; Yoon-Hyeong Choi; Bo Ra Lee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Splenic lymphoma with massive splenomegaly: Case report with review of literature.

Authors:  Sachin B Ingle; Chitra R Hinge Ingle
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  Fever of unknown origin revealed to be primary splenic lymphoma: A rare case report with review of the literature.

Authors:  Pan-Ge Sun; Bei Cheng; Jin-Feng Wang; Ping He
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-14

5.  Primary splenic lymphoma discovered on massive splenomegaly: A case report.

Authors:  Hazem Beji; Mahdi Bouassida; Ghazi Laamiri; Emna Chelbi; Salwa Nechi; Hassen Touinsi
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-27

6.  Ultrasound-guided percutaneous splenic biopsy using an 18-G core biopsy needle: our experience with 52 cases.

Authors:  Nirav Patel; Gemma Dawe; Ken Tung
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Percutaneous image-guided biopsy for non-mass-forming isolated splenomegaly and suspected malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tokue; Satoshi Hirasawa; Hideo Morita; Yoshinori Koyma; Masaya Miyazaki; Kei Shibuya; Azusa Tokue; Sachiko Nakano; Yoshito Tsushima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Primary splenic lymphoma: Current diagnostic trends.

Authors:  Sachin B Ingle; Chitra R Hinge Ingle
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 1.337

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.