Literature DB >> 18192184

Problematica old and new.

Ronald A Jenner1, D Timothy J Littlewood.   

Abstract

Problematica are taxa that defy robust phylogenetic placement. Traditionally the term was restricted to fossil forms, but it is clear that extant taxa may be just as difficult to place, whether using morphological or molecular (nucleotide, gene or genomic) markers for phylogeny reconstruction. We discuss the kinds and causes of Problematica within the Metazoa, as well as criteria for their recognition and possible solutions. The inclusive set of Problematica changes depending upon the nature and quality of (homologous) data available, the methods of phylogeny reconstruction and the sister taxa inferred by their placement or displacement. We address Problematica in the context of pre-cladistic phylogenetics, numerical morphological cladistics and molecular phylogenetics, and focus on general biological and methodological implications of Problematica, rather than presenting a review of individual taxa. Rather than excluding Problematica from phylogeny reconstruction, as has often been preferred, we conclude that the study of Problematica is crucial for both the resolution of metazoan phylogeny and the proper inference of body plan evolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18192184      PMCID: PMC2614229          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  63 in total

Review 1.  The new animal phylogeny: reliability and implications.

Authors:  A Adoutte; G Balavoine; N Lartillot; O Lespinet; B Prud'homme; R de Rosa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Phylogenetic systematics turns over a new leaf.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  A three-dimensionally preserved fossil polychaete worm from the Silurian of Herefordshire, England.

Authors:  M D Sutton; D E Briggs; D J Siveter; D J Siveter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences.

Authors:  K J Peterson; D J Eernisse
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Hylid frog phylogeny and sampling strategies for speciose clades.

Authors:  John J Wiens; James W Fetzner; Christopher L Parkinson; Tod W Reeder
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia.

Authors:  Hervé Philippe; Nicolas Lartillot; Henner Brinkmann
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 7.  Hooking some stem-group "worms": fossil lophotrochozoans in the Burgess Shale.

Authors:  Nicholas J Butterfield
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  Molecular evidence that echiurans and pogonophorans are derived annelids.

Authors:  D McHugh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Bushes in the tree of life.

Authors:  Antonis Rokas; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Acoel flatworms are not platyhelminthes: evidence from phylogenomics.

Authors:  Hervé Philippe; Henner Brinkmann; Pedro Martinez; Marta Riutort; Jaume Baguñà
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  The evolution of the animals: introduction to a Linnean tercentenary celebration.

Authors:  Maximilian J Telford; D Timothy J Littlewood
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Three Cambrian fossils assembled into an extinct body plan of cnidarian affinity.

Authors:  Qiang Ou; Jian Han; Zhifei Zhang; Degan Shu; Ge Sun; Georg Mayer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The nomenclature of the recent Pentastomida (Crustacea), with a list of species and available names.

Authors:  Gary C B Poore
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 1.431

4.  Tentaculate fossils from the Cambrian of Canada (British Columbia) and China (Yunnan) interpreted as primitive deuterostomes.

Authors:  Jean-Bernard Caron; Simon Conway Morris; Degan Shu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Detailed reconstruction of the nervous and muscular system of Lobatocerebridae with an evaluation of its annelid affinity.

Authors:  Alexandra Kerbl; Nicolas Bekkouche; Wolfgang Sterrer; Katrine Worsaae
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  On the phylogenetic position of Myzostomida: can 77 genes get it wrong?

Authors:  Christoph Bleidorn; Lars Podsiadlowski; Min Zhong; Igor Eeckhaut; Stefanie Hartmann; Kenneth M Halanych; Ralph Tiedemann
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Phylogenetic relationships within the Opisthokonta based on phylogenomic analyses of conserved single-copy protein domains.

Authors:  Guifré Torruella; Romain Derelle; Jordi Paps; B Franz Lang; Andrew J Roger; Kamran Shalchian-Tabrizi; Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Eumalacostracan phylogeny and total evidence: limitations of the usual suspects.

Authors:  Ronald A Jenner; Ciara Ní Dhubhghaill; Matteo P Ferla; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.260

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.