Literature DB >> 18191293

Is the combination of negative computed tomography result and negative lumbar puncture result sufficient to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage?

Jeffrey J Perry1, Alena Spacek, Melissa Forbes, George A Wells, Melodie Mortensen, Cheryl Symington, Nicole Fortin, Ian G Stiell.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Current clinical practice assumes a negative computed tomography (CT) head scan result and a negative lumbar puncture result together are adequate to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients with acute headache. Our objective is to determine the sensitivity of a negative CT result combined with a negative lumbar puncture result to exclude subarachnoid hemorrhage.
METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted at 2 tertiary care emergency departments (EDs) during 3 years. We enrolled all patients who were older than 15 years, had a nontraumatic acute headache and normal neurologic examination result, and who had a CT head scan and a lumbar puncture if the CT result was negative (ie, no blood in the subarachnoid space). Patients were followed up with a structured telephone questionnaire 6 to 36 months after their ED visit and electronic hospital records review to ensure no missed subarachnoid hemorrhage. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of the strategy of CT and then lumbar puncture for subarachnoid hemorrhage.
RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-two patients were enrolled, including 61 with subarachnoid hemorrhage. The mean patient age was 43.6 years, with 59.1% female patients. All cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage were identified on initial CT or lumbar puncture. One patient without subarachnoid hemorrhage was subsequently diagnosed with cerebral aneurysm, requiring surgery. The strategy classified patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of 100% (95% CI 94% to 100%), 67% (95% CI 63% to 71%), 3.03 (95% CI 2.69 to 3.53), and 0. For diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage or aneurysm, these were 98% (95% CI 91% to 100%), 67% (95% CI 63% to 71%), 2.98 (95% CI 2.63 to 3.38), and 0.02 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.17), respectively.
CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest prospective study evaluating the accuracy of a strategy of CT and lumbar puncture to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage in alert ED patients with an acute headache. This study validates clinical practice that a negative CT with a negative lumbar puncture is sufficient to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18191293     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.10.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  11 in total

1.  Decisions: does a patient with a thunderclap headache need a lumbar puncture?

Authors:  Ben Fine; Navneet Singh; Richard Aviv; R Loch Macdonald
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Validation of the Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule in patients with acute headache.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Perry; Marco L A Sivilotti; Jane Sutherland; Corinne M Hohl; Marcel Émond; Lisa A Calder; Christian Vaillancourt; Venkatesh Thirganasambandamoorthy; Howard Lesiuk; George A Wells; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Thunderclap headache.

Authors:  Esma Dilli
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Lumbar punctures: use and diagnostic efficiency in emergency medical departments.

Authors:  Bilal Majed; Hélène Zephir; Valérie Pichonnier-Cassagne; Yazdan Yazdanpanah; Philippe Lestavel; Pierre Valette; Patrick Vermersch
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-11-19

5.  Pooled analysis of patients with thunderclap headache evaluated by CT and LP: is angiography necessary in patients with negative evaluations?

Authors:  Sean I Savitz; Emily B Levitan; Robert Wears; Jonathan A Edlow
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 3.181

Review 6.  Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage from a neuroimaging perspective.

Authors:  Airton Leonardo de Oliveira Manoel; Ann Mansur; Amanda Murphy; David Turkel-Parrella; Matt Macdonald; R Loch Macdonald; Walter Montanera; Thomas R Marotta; Aditya Bharatha; Khaled Effendi; Tom A Schweizer
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Differentiation between traumatic tap and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Perry; Bader Alyahya; Marco L A Sivilotti; Michael J Bullard; Marcel Émond; Jane Sutherland; Andrew Worster; Corinne Hohl; Jacques S Lee; Mary A Eisenhauer; Merril Pauls; Howard Lesiuk; George A Wells; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-02-18

8.  Subarachnoid haemorrhage guidelines and clinical practice: a cross-sectional study of emergency department consultants' and neurospecialists' views and risk tolerances.

Authors:  J Lansley; C Selai; A S Krishnan; K Lobotesis; H R Jäger
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Looking at "thunderclap headache" differently? Circa 2016.

Authors:  K Ravishankar
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.383

10.  New clinical decision rule to exclude subarachnoid haemorrhage for acute headache: a prospective multicentre observational study.

Authors:  Akio Kimura; Kentaro Kobayashi; Hitoshi Yamaguchi; Takeshi Takahashi; Masahiro Harada; Hideki Honda; Yoshio Mori; Keika Hirose; Noriko Tanaka
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.