BACKGROUND: Topotecan 14-day infusion combined with cisplatin was highly active in ovarian cancer, but too myelosuppressive. We therefore sought to evaluate the feasibility of substituting oxaliplatin for cisplatin to improve safety. METHODS: Ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer patients, pretreated with at least one prior platinum-containing regimen, performance status (PS) 0-1, without prior pelvic radiation were eligible. Topotecan was continuously infused days 1-15; oxaliplatin was given days 1 and 15; cycles were repeated every 28 days. Five dose levels were explored: topotecan (mg/m2/day)/oxaliplatin (mg/m2) doses: (1) 0.2/65; (2) 0.2/75; (3) 0.2/85; (4) 0.3/85; (5) 0.4/85. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (20 ovarian, 1 tubal, and 2 peritoneal) were entered: median age 56 years (range, 37-77); PS: 0=12 and 1=11; histology: papillary serous 7, serous 4, adenocarcinoma 8, poorly differentiated 2. Median of 4 cycles were delivered. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 3 of 7 patients at level 5 (with fever at levels 4 and 5), without grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities were mild and reversible (mainly gastrointestinal), except one grade 3 neuropathy and one oxaliplatin-related grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction. Six objective responses (five of them complete) were documented among 22 patients spanning several dose levels. CONCLUSION: Topotecan continuous infusion, combined with oxaliplatin, was associated with no grade 4 hematologic toxicity and evidence of activity. The recommended phase II dose is topotecan 0.4 mg/m2/day continuous infusion d1-15 with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15. A phase II evaluation as second-line treatment for both platinum-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cancer recurrences is ongoing.
BACKGROUND:Topotecan 14-day infusion combined with cisplatin was highly active in ovarian cancer, but too myelosuppressive. We therefore sought to evaluate the feasibility of substituting oxaliplatin for cisplatin to improve safety. METHODS: Ovarian and primary peritoneal cancerpatients, pretreated with at least one prior platinum-containing regimen, performance status (PS) 0-1, without prior pelvic radiation were eligible. Topotecan was continuously infused days 1-15; oxaliplatin was given days 1 and 15; cycles were repeated every 28 days. Five dose levels were explored: topotecan (mg/m2/day)/oxaliplatin (mg/m2) doses: (1) 0.2/65; (2) 0.2/75; (3) 0.2/85; (4) 0.3/85; (5) 0.4/85. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (20 ovarian, 1 tubal, and 2 peritoneal) were entered: median age 56 years (range, 37-77); PS: 0=12 and 1=11; histology: papillary serous 7, serous 4, adenocarcinoma 8, poorly differentiated 2. Median of 4 cycles were delivered. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 3 of 7 patients at level 5 (with fever at levels 4 and 5), without grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities were mild and reversible (mainly gastrointestinal), except one grade 3 neuropathy and one oxaliplatin-related grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction. Six objective responses (five of them complete) were documented among 22 patients spanning several dose levels. CONCLUSION:Topotecan continuous infusion, combined with oxaliplatin, was associated with no grade 4 hematologic toxicity and evidence of activity. The recommended phase II dose is topotecan 0.4 mg/m2/day continuous infusion d1-15 with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15. A phase II evaluation as second-line treatment for both platinum-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cancer recurrences is ongoing.
Authors: J H Beijnen; B R Smith; W J Keijer; R van Gijn; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; L T Vlasveld; S Rodenhuis; W J Underberg Journal: J Pharm Biomed Anal Date: 1990 Impact factor: 3.935
Authors: John C Elkas; William E Winter; Mildred R Chernofsky; Jan Sunde; Michael A Bidus; Sarah Bernstein; G Scott Rose Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2006-09-22 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: G Mathé; Y Kidani; M Segiguchi; M Eriguchi; G Fredj; G Peytavin; J L Misset; S Brienza; F de Vassals; E Chenu Journal: Biomed Pharmacother Date: 1989 Impact factor: 6.529
Authors: A B Simpson; P M Calvert; J A Sludden; A V Boddy; M J Griffin; A Schätzlein; P Wilson; K Fishwick; A Wheatley; G A Ross; A H Calvert; C J Twelves Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: H Hochster; S Wadler; C Runowicz; L Liebes; H Cohen; R Wallach; J Sorich; B Taubes; J Speyer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Gross-Goupil; F Lokiec; G Lopez; J-M Tigaud; A Hasbini; D Romain; J-L Misset; F Goldwasser Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Stacey M Stein; Amy Tiersten; Howard S Hochster; Stephanie V Blank; Bhavana Pothuri; John Curtin; Ilan Shapira; Benjamin Levinson; Percy Ivy; Benson Joseph; Achuta Kumar Guddati; Franco Muggia Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Charles J Nock; Joanna M Brell; Joseph A Bokar; Matthew M Cooney; Brenda Cooper; Joseph Gibbons; Smitha Krishnamurthi; Sudhir Manda; Panayiotis Savvides; Scot C Remick; Percy Ivy; Afshin Dowlati Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2009-09-23 Impact factor: 3.850