Literature DB >> 18189343

Use of DNA ladders for reproducible protein fractionation by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) for quantitative proteomics.

Guoan Zhang1, David Fenyö, Thomas A Neubert.   

Abstract

In proteomics, one-dimensional (1D) sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) is widely used for protein fractionation prior to mass spectrometric analysis to enhance the dynamic range of analysis and to improve the identification of low-abundance proteins. Such protein prefractionation works well for quantitation strategies if the proteins are labeled prior to separation. However, because of the poor reproducibility of cutting gel slices, especially when small amounts of samples are analyzed, its application in label-free and peptide-labeling quantitative proteomics methods has been greatly limited. To overcome this limitation, we developed a new strategy in which a DNA ladder is mixed with the protein sample before PAGE separation. After PAGE separation, the DNA ladder is stained to allow for easy, precise, and reproducible gel cutting. To this end, a novel visible DNA-staining method was developed. This staining method is fast, sensitive, and compatible with mass spectrometry. To evaluate the reproducibility of DNA-ladder-assisted gel cutting for quantitative protein fractionation, we used stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). Our results show that the quantitative error associated with fractionation can be minimized using the DNA-assisted fractionation and multiple replicates of gel cutting. In conclusion, 1D PAGE fractionation in combination with DNA ladders can be used for label-free comparative proteomics without compromising quantitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18189343      PMCID: PMC2667379          DOI: 10.1021/pr700601y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  39 in total

1.  Proteomic characterization of the human centrosome by protein correlation profiling.

Authors:  Jens S Andersen; Christopher J Wilkinson; Thibault Mayor; Peter Mortensen; Erich A Nigg; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Profiling core proteomes of human cell lines by one-dimensional PAGE and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Markus Schirle; Marie-Anne Heurtier; Bernhard Kuster
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 3.  Usefulness of visible dyes for the staining of protein or DNA in electrophoresis.

Authors:  Li-Tai Jin; Jung-Kap Choi
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Expanded coverage of the human heart mitochondrial proteome using multidimensional liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Sara P Gaucher; Steven W Taylor; Eoin Fahy; Bing Zhang; Dale E Warnock; Soumitra S Ghosh; Bradford W Gibson
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Hongbin Liu; Rovshan G Sadygov; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Informatics platform for global proteomic profiling and biomarker discovery using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Dragan Radulovic; Salomeh Jelveh; Soyoung Ryu; T Guy Hamilton; Eric Foss; Yongyi Mao; Andrew Emili
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  Differential mass spectrometry: a label-free LC-MS method for finding significant differences in complex peptide and protein mixtures.

Authors:  Matthew C Wiener; Jeffrey R Sachs; Ekaterina G Deyanova; Nathan A Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Differentiation of Coxiella burnetii isolates by analysis of restriction-endonuclease-digested DNA separated by SDS-PAGE.

Authors:  L R Hendrix; J E Samuel; L P Mallavia
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1991-02

9.  Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels.

Authors:  A Shevchenko; M Wilm; O Vorm; M Mann
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Temporal analysis of phosphotyrosine-dependent signaling networks by quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Blagoy Blagoev; Shao-En Ong; Irina Kratchmarova; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of the variation in sample preparation for comparative proteomics using stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture.

Authors:  Guoan Zhang; David Fenyö; Thomas A Neubert
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Comprehensive characterization of glioblastoma tumor tissues for biomarker identification using mass spectrometry-based label-free quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Maxime S Heroux; Marla A Chesnik; Brian D Halligan; Mona Al-Gizawiy; Jennifer M Connelly; Wade M Mueller; Scott D Rand; Elizabeth J Cochran; Peter S LaViolette; Mark G Malkin; Kathleen M Schmainda; Shama P Mirza
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Bottom-Up Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics as an Investigative Analytical Tool for Discovery and Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples.

Authors:  Ravi Amunugama; Richard Jones; Michael Ford; David Allen
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Sample preparation techniques for the untargeted LC-MS-based discovery of peptides in complex biological matrices.

Authors:  Inez Finoulst; Martijn Pinkse; William Van Dongen; Peter Verhaert
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-12-12

5.  Characterisation of the circulating acellular proteome of healthy sheep using LC-MS/MS-based proteomics analysis of serum.

Authors:  Saul Chemonges; Rajesh Gupta; Paul C Mills; Steven R Kopp; Pawel Sadowski
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.480

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.