Literature DB >> 18187750

Fluid therapy in resuscitated sepsis: less is more.

Lakshmi Durairaj1, Gregory A Schmidt.   

Abstract

Fluid infusion may be lifesaving in patients with severe sepsis, especially in the earliest phases of treatment. Following initial resuscitation, however, fluid boluses often fail to augment perfusion and may be harmful. In this review, we seek to compare and contrast the impact of fluids in early and later sepsis; show that much fluid therapy is clinically ineffective in patients with severe sepsis; explore the detrimental aspects of excessive volume infusion; examine how clinicians assess the intravascular volume state; appraise the potential for dynamic indexes to predict fluid responsiveness; and recommend a clinical approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18187750     DOI: 10.1378/chest.07-1496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  31 in total

Review 1.  A critique of fluid bolus resuscitation in severe sepsis.

Authors:  Andrew K Hilton; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  Focused cardiac ultrasound in the early resuscitation of severe sepsis and septic shock: a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Hiroshi Sekiguchi; Yohei Harada; Hector R Villarraga; Sunil V Mankad; Ognjen Gajic
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Increased fluid administration in the first three hours of sepsis resuscitation is associated with reduced mortality: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sarah J Lee; Kannan Ramar; John G Park; Ognjen Gajic; Guangxi Li; Rahul Kashyap
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  [Volume replacement in intensive care medicine].

Authors:  B Nohé; A Ploppa; V Schmidt; K Unertl
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Response to fluid boluses in the fluid and catheter treatment trial.

Authors:  Matthew R Lammi; Brianne Aiello; Gregory T Burg; Tayyab Rehman; Ivor S Douglas; Arthur P Wheeler; Bennett P deBoisblanc
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  The passive leg raise test to predict fluid responsiveness in children--preliminary observations.

Authors:  Guo-ping Lu; Gangfeng Yan; Yang Chen; Zhu-jin Lu; Lin-en Zhang; Niranjan Kissoon
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Michael J Lanspa; Colin K Grissom; Eliotte L Hirshberg; Jason P Jones; Samuel M Brown
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 8.  State of the evidence: mechanical ventilation with PEEP in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Jonathan Wiesen; Moshe Ornstein; Adriano R Tonelli; Venu Menon; Rendell W Ashton
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Renin-angiotensin system activation correlates with microvascular dysfunction in a prospective cohort study of clinical sepsis.

Authors:  Kevin C Doerschug; Angela S Delsing; Gregory A Schmidt; Alix Ashare
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Brachial artery flow velocity variation: another victory for hand-carried ultrasound?

Authors:  Gregory A Schmidt
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.