Literature DB >> 18187095

Use of the percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with severe refractory cardiogenic shock as a bridge to long-term left ventricular assist device implantation.

Gary M Idelchik1, Leo Simpson, Andrew B Civitello, Pranav Loyalka, Igor D Gregoric, Reynolds Delgado, Biswajit Kar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For patients with persistent cardiogenic shock refractory to intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) support, there are only limited means of resuscitation and bridging to surgical left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and emergency surgical approaches have been attempted but are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device (PVAD) as a bridge to LVAD implantation in patients in cardiogenic shock refractory to IABP and pressor support.
METHODS: Between May 2003 and April 2006, at our institution, 18 patients in severe refractory cardiogenic shock received a PVAD as a bridge to LVAD placement or orthotopic heart transplantation. Six patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and 12 had nonischemic cardiomyopathy. At the time of PVAD placement, 17 were receiving IABP support, and 10 were undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
RESULTS: The mean duration of PVAD support was 4.2 +/- 2.5 days. During this time, the cardiac index improved from 0.86 +/- 0.66 to 2.50 +/- 0.93 liters/min/m2 (p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure improved from 72 +/- 11 to 98 +/- 15 mm Hg (p = 0.001), and systemic mixed venous oxygenation improved from 37 +/- 7 to 62 +/- 6 mm Hg (p < 0.001). We terminated life support in 4 of the 18 patients before LVAD placement; 14 were successfully bridged to LVAD or heart transplantation. The mortality rate was 27% at 30 days and 33% at 6 months. There were no PVAD-associated deaths.
CONCLUSION: In patients with terminal hemodynamic collapse, PVAD support is an effective bridging therapy to LVAD and appears to be a viable alternative to other invasive methods of support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18187095     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  9 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices during cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Stéphane Cook; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Current status of extracorporeal ventricular assist devices in Japan.

Authors:  Takashi Nishimura
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Temporary left ventricular assist device through an axillary access is a promising approach to improve outcomes in refractory cardiogenic shock patients.

Authors:  Karen M Doersch; Carl W Tong; Enrique Gongora; Subbareddy Konda; Basar Sareyyupoglu
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  The TandemHeart as a bridge to a long-term axial-flow left ventricular assist device (bridge to bridge).

Authors:  Igor D Gregoric; Leon P Jacob; Saverio La Francesca; Brian A Bruckner; William E Cohn; Pranav Loyalka; Biswajit Kar; O H Frazier
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008

Review 5.  Percutaneous ventricular assist devices for cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Stéphane Cook; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2008-09

6.  Percutaneous ventricular assist devices: new deus ex machina?

Authors:  Diego Arroyo; Stéphane Cook
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2011-07-31

Review 7.  Current state-of-the-art of device therapy for advanced heart failure.

Authors:  Lawrence S Lee; Prem S Shekar
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.351

8.  Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Shilpkumar Arora; Sopan Lahewala; Varun Kumar; Ghanshyam P S Shantha; Jacob C Jentzer; John M Stulak; Bernard J Gersh; Rajiv Gulati; Charanjit S Rihal; Abhiram Prasad; Abhishek J Deshmukh
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Ethical challenges with the left ventricular assist device as a destination therapy.

Authors:  Aaron G Rizzieri; Joseph L Verheijde; Mohamed Y Rady; Joan L McGregor
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 2.464

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.