BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Because of controversy concerning risk factors for progression, recurrence, and persistence of bladder cancer, we reviewed the data of our patients with superficial bladder tumors. Based on a differentiated approach with second-look transurethral resection (TUR) and/or intravesical metaphylaxis, we wanted to answer the following questions: Was this approach efficient? What risk factors demand a second-look TUR? Is surveillance appropriate for patients at low risk? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospectively we analyzed the data of 251 patients with superficial bladder cancer with a mean follow-up time of 69 (range 20 to 107) months. We focused on recurrence rates, tumor-persistence and progression, and types of adjuvant treatment. An early reintervention within 6 to 8 weeks after primary resection was defined as a second-look TUR. To judge the necessity of early reintervention and metaphylaxis, we performed a matched-pair analysis for the low-risk group. RESULTS: Tumor stages included T(a) (170 patients, 68%); T(1) (72 patients, 29%); carcinoma in situ (CIS) (9 patients, 4%). Grades included grade 1 (58 patients, 23%); grade 2 (117 patients, 47%); and grade 3 (76 patients, 30%). Thirty-eight (15%) tumors were already classified as recurrent. A second-look TUR was performed on 222 (88%) patients, indicating a persistence rate of 25%. Persistence rates for low-risk tumors (T(a) grade 1/2) were 9%; rates for T(a) grade 3 tumors were significantly higher. Risk factors for persistence were multilocularity and higher grade and stage. Matched-pair analysis for the low-risk group did not show any significant advantage for second-look TUR. After complete resection of T(1) grade 3 tumors, the risk of progression is similar to that for tumors of lower grade and stage. The overall recurrence rate was 25%, with a higher risk of upstaging in cases of higher stage or grade and multilocular and persisting tumors. CONCLUSION: The overall tumor recurrence rate of 25% reflects the efficacy of our differentiated approach with selective use of second-look TUR and intravesical metaphylaxis (intravesical chemotherapy). Second-look TUR is indicated for multifocal and recurrent tumors or in patients whose tumors put them at high risk. Patients with grade 2/3 tumors, multifocal grade 1 tumors, and all T(1) tumors received metaphylaxis; intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin was instilled in patients with CIS. With this regimen, even in T(1) grade 3 stages, organ preservation can be achieved.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Because of controversy concerning risk factors for progression, recurrence, and persistence of bladder cancer, we reviewed the data of our patients with superficial bladder tumors. Based on a differentiated approach with second-look transurethral resection (TUR) and/or intravesical metaphylaxis, we wanted to answer the following questions: Was this approach efficient? What risk factors demand a second-look TUR? Is surveillance appropriate for patients at low risk? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospectively we analyzed the data of 251 patients with superficial bladder cancer with a mean follow-up time of 69 (range 20 to 107) months. We focused on recurrence rates, tumor-persistence and progression, and types of adjuvant treatment. An early reintervention within 6 to 8 weeks after primary resection was defined as a second-look TUR. To judge the necessity of early reintervention and metaphylaxis, we performed a matched-pair analysis for the low-risk group. RESULTS:Tumor stages included T(a) (170 patients, 68%); T(1) (72 patients, 29%); carcinoma in situ (CIS) (9 patients, 4%). Grades included grade 1 (58 patients, 23%); grade 2 (117 patients, 47%); and grade 3 (76 patients, 30%). Thirty-eight (15%) tumors were already classified as recurrent. A second-look TUR was performed on 222 (88%) patients, indicating a persistence rate of 25%. Persistence rates for low-risk tumors (T(a) grade 1/2) were 9%; rates for T(a) grade 3 tumors were significantly higher. Risk factors for persistence were multilocularity and higher grade and stage. Matched-pair analysis for the low-risk group did not show any significant advantage for second-look TUR. After complete resection of T(1) grade 3 tumors, the risk of progression is similar to that for tumors of lower grade and stage. The overall recurrence rate was 25%, with a higher risk of upstaging in cases of higher stage or grade and multilocular and persisting tumors. CONCLUSION: The overall tumor recurrence rate of 25% reflects the efficacy of our differentiated approach with selective use of second-look TUR and intravesical metaphylaxis (intravesical chemotherapy). Second-look TUR is indicated for multifocal and recurrent tumors or in patients whose tumors put them at high risk. Patients with grade 2/3 tumors, multifocal grade 1 tumors, and all T(1) tumors received metaphylaxis; intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin was instilled in patients with CIS. With this regimen, even in T(1) grade 3 stages, organ preservation can be achieved.
Authors: Siamak Daneshmand; Anne K Schuckman; Bernard H Bochner; Michael S Cookson; Tracy M Downs; Leonard G Gomella; H Barton Grossman; Ashish M Kamat; Badrinath R Konety; Cheryl T Lee; Kamal S Pohar; Raj S Pruthi; Matthew J Resnick; Norm D Smith; J Alfred Witjes; Mark P Schoenberg; Gary D Steinberg Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 14.432