Literature DB >> 18186689

Endophytic lesions: a predictor of failure in laparoscopic renal cryoablation.

Andrew D Wright1, Thomas M T Turk, Michael S Nagar, Michael W Phelan, Kent T Perry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic renal cryoablation is an emerging minimally invasive management option for T(1) renal lesions. In an analysis of patients treated with laparoscopic cryoablation for renal lesions, our objective was to compare the treatment outcomes in patients with exophytic/partially exophytic and endophytic (peripheral but completely intrarenal) lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 32 consecutive patients with anterior renal lesions who were treated with laparoscopic renal cryoablation between 2003 and 2005. Biopsy samples were obtained from the majority of lesions intraoperatively. The lesions were managed with 17 gauge needles and two freeze/thaw cycles. Follow-up was performed with CT scans at 3, 6, and 12 months, and then yearly. Treatment failures were defined as continued enhancement on CT or growth of the lesion. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test, correlative, and multiple regression analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 35 lesions in 32 patients were identified. Median lesion size was 1.9 cm. Median age was 67 years, with most patients having significant comorbidities. The median preoperative and postoperative creatinine level was 1.3 and 1.5 mg/dL (P = 0.38). Of the biopsy samples from 27 of 35 lesions, 18 showed renal cell carcinoma, 5 were found to be benign, and findings from 4 were inconclusive. Three lesions were completely endophytic. The median follow-up was 18 months, with treatment failures noted in 2 of 35 lesions (6%), both of which were endophytic (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that only the endophytic status of a lesion was a predictor of failure (P < 0.05). These were lesions that relied entirely on intraoperative ultrasonography for targeting, which suggests that failure was a technical error.
CONCLUSIONS: Experience with renal cryoablation is still evolving. Our series further defines the role of laparoscopic renal cryoablation and its limitations in managing peripheral endophytic tumors. Completely endophytic lesions have a significantly higher risk of treatment failure. Reliance solely on intraoperative ultrasonography with no visual cues is a risk factor for treatment failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18186689     DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.9850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  10 in total

1.  Efficacy of laparoscopic renal cryoablation as an alternative treatment for small renal mass in patients with poor operability: experience from the Korean single center.

Authors:  Young Hwii Ko; Hoon Choi; Sung Gu Kang; Hong Seok Park; Jeong Gu Lee; Je Jong Kim; Seok Ho Kang; Jun Cheon
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.878

2.  Arterial Clamping Increases Central Renal Cryoablation Efficacy: An Animal Study.

Authors:  Lasse L Nonboe; Tommy K Nielsen; Søren Høyer; Ole Graumann; Jørgen Frøkiær; Michael Borre
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-08-25

3.  The impact of renal tumor size on the efficacy of laparoscopic renal cryoablation.

Authors:  Byeong Kuk Ham; Sung Gu Kang; Hoon Choi; Young Hwii Ko; Seok Ho Kang; Jun Cheon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-03-19

4.  Cryoablation for endophytic renal cell carcinoma: intermediate-term oncologic efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Se Hong Park; Seok Ho Kang; Young Hwii Ko; Sung Gu Kang; Hong Seok Park; Du Geon Moon; Jeong Gu Lee; Je Jong Kim; Jun Cheon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-08-18

Review 5.  Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging appearance of renal neoplasms after radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation.

Authors:  Satomi Kawamoto; Stephen B Solomon; David A Bluemke; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 6.  Role of tumor location in selecting patients for percutaneous versus surgical cryoablation of renal masses.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Daniel J Canter; Marc C Smaldone; Tianyu Li; Jay Simhan; Boris Rozenfeld; Ervin Teper; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Rosalia Viterbo; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.344

7.  Review of the efficacy and safety of cryoablation for the treatment of small renal masses.

Authors:  Anil Kapoor; Naji J Touma; Regina El Dib
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  A matched-cohort comparison of laparoscopic renal cryoablation using ultra-thin cryoprobes with open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Young Hwii Ko; Hong Seok Park; Du Geon Moon; Jeong Gu Lee; Je Jong Kim; Duck Ki Yoon; Seok Ho Kang; Jun Cheon
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 9.  Current status of cryotherapy for prostate and kidney cancer.

Authors:  Seok Cho; Seok Ho Kang
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-11-21

Review 10.  Laparoscopic ultrasonography: The wave of the future in renal cell carcinoma?

Authors:  Bitian Liu; Yunhong Zhan; Xiaonan Chen; Qingpeng Xie; Bin Wu
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.628

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.