Literature DB >> 18186680

Ureteroscopy for stone treatment using new 270 degrees semiflexible endoscope: in vitro, ex vivo, and clinical application.

Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl1, Lutz Trojan, Peter Alken, Maurice-Stephan Michel, Thomas Knoll.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The use of flexible ureteroscopy for diagnosis and management of upper urinary tract diseases is limited both by loss of maximum active deflection through the inserted working probes and a high frequency of damage with consequent costs. A newly developed ureteroscope (Flex-X, Karl Storz) with a maximized angle of deflection was introduced to overcome these problems. The aim of our study was to compare this new ureteroscope with an established device in vitro, ex vivo, and in a clinical approach.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Angles of maximum active deflection and maximum irrigation flow were measured for both scopes in vitro with an empty working channel and after introduction of different lithotripsy and stone extraction probes. In addition, the loss of maximum active deflection and broken optical fibers of the scopes were assessed after 100 flexible ureteroscopies in an ex-vivo pig cadaver model. The clinical performance of both ureteroscopes was evaluated in 32 patients for management of lower pole stones.
RESULTS: The new ureteroscope displays highly improved deflection compared with the standard scope; deflection angles as much as 270 degrees with an empty working channel were achieved. Thin probes did not inhibit maximum deflection. Durability in ex vivotrials was high. Only minimal loss of maximum deflection and three broken optical fibers were observed. In clinical usage, a stone-free rate of 100% was achieved after 4 weeks. In three patients, the opening mechanism of a basket did not work with maximum deflection because of high friction.
CONCLUSION: The new ureterorenoscope facilitates retrograde stone management and might diminish repair intervals. Further development of comparable devices will support flexible ureterorenoscopy as a standard stone management procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18186680     DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.0291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  8 in total

1.  [Calyceal stones].

Authors:  C Netsch; A J Gross
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Technical innovations in endourological stone therapy].

Authors:  P Honeck; U Nagele; M S Michel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors?

Authors:  Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Tuna Mut; Patrick Krombach; Maurice Stephan Michel; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-11-05

4.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus miniaturized PNL for solitary renal calculi of 10-30 mm size.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Jan Peter Jessen; Patrick Honeck; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Volume should be used instead of diameter for kidney stones between 10 and 20 mm to determine the type of surgery and increase success.

Authors:  Ediz Vuruskan; Okan Dilek; Kadir Karkin; Umut Unal; Lokman Ayhan; Nevzat Can Sener
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.861

Review 6.  The Single Wire Ureteral Access Sheath, Both Safe and Economical.

Authors:  Joan C Delto; George Wayne; Ajaydeep Sidhu; Rafael Yanes; Akshay Bhandari; Alan M Nieder
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2016-11-15

7.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi smaller than one centimeter.

Authors:  Hemendra Navinchandra Shah
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10

8.  Managing caliceal stones.

Authors:  Andreas J Gross; Sophie Knipper; Christopher Netsch
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.