Literature DB >> 18186433

Imaging of acute appendicitis and its impact on negative appendectomy and perforation rates: the St. Paul's experience.

W K Chooi1, Jacqueline A Brown, P Zetler, S Wiseman, P Cooperberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preoperative imaging of acute appendicitis is widely practised. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of preoperative imaging of acute appendicitis in our institution and its effect on the negative appendectomy rate and perforation rates.
METHODS: We undertook a retrospective review of all patients who underwent appendectomy from January 2000 to December 2004. All available preoperative ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and pathology results were reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 380 appendectomies were performed over this time period for the preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Fifty-nine patients had histologically normal appendices, giving an overall negative appendectomy rate of 15.5%. Overall, patients who had preoperative imaging showed a lower negative appendectomy rate (11.4%) than did those without imaging (22.2%). Without preoperative imaging, women had a higher negative appendectomy rate (34.3%) than did men (17.4%). Reduction in the negative appendectomy rate was demonstrated with preoperative imaging in both sexes (16.7% and 5.7%, respectively). Also demonstrated is a definite trend toward increased use of preoperative CT and away from US as the sole preoperative imaging modality. This is associated with a reduced negative appendectomy rate.
CONCLUSIONS: The increased use of preoperative imaging, particularly CT, is associated with a decreased negative appendectomy rate and a decreased perforation rate at our institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18186433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J        ISSN: 0846-5371            Impact factor:   2.248


  8 in total

1.  Appendicitis-the balance between cost effectiveness and safety remains challenging.

Authors:  Juliane Liese; Thomas M Halbinger; Frank Ulrich; Wolf O Bechstein; Christoph W Strey
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Negative Appendectomy: an Audit of Resident-Performed Surgery. How Can Its Incidence Be Minimized?

Authors:  Mohit Kumar Joshi; Richa Joshi; Shaan E Alam; Sarla Agarwal; Sunil Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 3.  Antibiotics versus appendectomy in the management of acute appendicitis: a review of the current evidence.

Authors:  Gerard J Fitzmaurice; Billy McWilliams; Hisham Hurreiz; Emanuel Epanomeritakis
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  A comparative study of the RIPASA and Alvarado scores in geriatric patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Davut Tekyol; Rohat Ak; Nihat Müjdat Hökenek; Mazlum Kılıç; Kübra Kaytaz Tekyol; Doğan Erdoğan
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.712

5.  An evaluation of a superfast MRI sequence in the diagnosis of suspected acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Bin Zhu; Bing Zhang; Ming Li; Shifu Xi; Decai Yu; Yitao Ding
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2012-12

6.  Gynecologic pathologies in our appendectomy series and literature review.

Authors:  Omer Engin; Bulent Calik; Mehmet Yildirim; Ali Coskun; Gulnihal Ay Coskun
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2011-04-12

7.  Acute appendicitis: is removal of a normal appendix still existing and can we reduce its rate?

Authors:  Gamal Khairy
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.485

8.  Further exploration during open appendicectomy; assessment of some common intraoperative findings.

Authors:  Adetunji Saliu Oguntola; Moses Layiwola Adeoti; Sulaiman Olayide Agodirin; Adetunji Adeniyi Oremakinde; Kunle O Ojemakinde
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.088

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.