Literature DB >> 18186057

Attitudes towards anorexia nervosa: the impact of framing on blame and stigma.

Michele A Crisafulli1, Ann Von Holle, Cynthia M Bulik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined experimentally the way in which exposure to a sociocultural versus a biological/genetic explanation of the etiology of anorexia nervosa (AN) differentially affected attitudes towards AN.
METHOD: Undergraduate nursing students were randomly assigned to read information emphasizing either biological/genetic or sociocultural factors in the development of AN. They then completed a series of questionnaires assessing their attitudes towards individuals with AN. Nonparametric tests were used to evaluate attitudinal differences between groups.
RESULTS: Those who were exposed to a biological/genetic explanation of the causes of AN tended to blame individuals with AN less than those exposed to a sociocultural explanation, although all results were not robust to correction for multiple comparisons.
CONCLUSION: If these results are replicated in larger, population-based samples, wider dissemination of information regarding the biological and genetic underpinnings of AN should be considered as a possible pathway in decreasing the blame-based stigma associated with AN. Copyright 2008 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18186057     DOI: 10.1002/eat.20507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Eat Disord        ISSN: 0276-3478            Impact factor:   4.861


  15 in total

1.  Interpreting genetics in the context of eating disorders: evidence of disease, not diversity.

Authors:  Michele Easter
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2013-11-28

2.  "Not all my fault": genetics, stigma, and personal responsibility for women with eating disorders.

Authors:  Michele M Easter
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Behavioral Genetics and Attributions of Moral Responsibility.

Authors:  Kathryn Tabb; Matthew S Lebowitz; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Biogenetic explanations and public acceptance of people with eating disorders.

Authors:  Matthias C Angermeyer; Eva Mnich; Anne Daubmann; Lena Herich; Karl Wegscheider; Christopher Kofahl; Olaf von dem Knesebeck
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Assessment of stigma associated with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: psychometric evaluation of the ADHD stigma questionnaire.

Authors:  Ida Kellison; Regina Bussing; Lindsay Bell; Cynthia Garvan
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 6.  Disease avoidance as a functional basis for stigmatization.

Authors:  Megan Oaten; Richard J Stevenson; Trevor I Case
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Motivation to eat and not to eat - The psycho-biological conflict in anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Guido K W Frank; Marisa C DeGuzman; Megan E Shott
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2019-04-10

8.  College students' perceptions of individuals with anorexia and bulimia nervosa.

Authors:  Natalie Wingfield; Nichole Kelly; Kasey Serdar; Victoria A Shivy; Suzanne E Mazzeo
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.861

Review 9.  Biomedical Explanations of Psychopathology and Their Implications for Attitudes and Beliefs About Mental Disorders.

Authors:  Matthew S Lebowitz; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 18.561

10.  Stigma resistance in eating disorders.

Authors:  Scott Griffiths; Jonathan M Mond; Stuart B Murray; Chris Thornton; Stephen Touyz
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-29       Impact factor: 4.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.