Literature DB >> 18185039

Do mountain bikers have a higher risk of scrotal disorders than on-road cyclists?

Michael Mitterberger1, Germer M Pinggera, Hannes Neuwirt, Daniela Colleselli, Alexandre Pelzer, Georg Bartsch, Hannes Strasser, Johann Gradl, Leo Pallwein, Ferdinand Frauscher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To sonographically investigate whether mountain bikers have a higher prevalence of scrotal abnormalities compared with on-road cyclists.
DESIGN: We studied 85 male mountain bikers (mean age: 25 years; range 17-45 years) and 50 male on-road cyclists (mean age: 23 years, range 15-46 years) with regard to scrotal findings on ultrasound (US).
SETTING: Medical University Innsbruck, Austria. PARTICIPANTS: Only males who gave a history of extensive mountain biking or on-road bicycling (2 hours or more per day on 6 days a week with a covered distance of more than 5,000 km/year) were entered in our study.
INTERVENTIONS: In addition to clinical evaluation, a standard ultrasonographic examination of the scrotum was performed using a linear array transducer operating at a frequency of 8.0 MHz (Acuson Sequoia 512). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The sonographic findings obtained in mountain bikers were compared with those obtained in on-road cyclists.
RESULTS: Eighty of 85 mountain bikers (94%) and 24 of 50 on-road cyclists (48%) presented with abnormal findings on scrotal US. Abnormal US findings in mountain bikers included scrotoliths in 69 bikers (81%), spermatoceles in 39 bikers (46%), and epididymal calcifications in 34 bikers (40%). US findings in on-road cyclists were scrotoliths in 8 cyclists (16%), spermatoceles in 13 cyclists (26%), and epididymal calcifications in 6 cyclists (12%). The overall number of scrotal abnormalities was significantly greater in mountain bikers than in on-road cyclists (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Mountain bikers compared with on-road cyclists have shown to be at a higher risk for scrotal disorders on US examination. Not only protective measures but also the awareness of the bikers are required to reduce the potential risk. Further studies should be undertaken to determine the clinical significance of the sonographic changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18185039     DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31815c042f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Sport Med        ISSN: 1050-642X            Impact factor:   3.638


  6 in total

Review 1.  Can ultrasound help to manage patients with scrotal trauma?

Authors:  T Adlan; S J Freeman
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2014-07-30

Review 2.  Unusual scrotal pathology: an overview.

Authors:  Henry M Rosevear; Alek Mishail; Yefim Sheynkin; Moshe Wald
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Multiparametric ultrasonography of the testicles.

Authors:  Tobias De Zordo; Daniel Stronegger; Leo Pallwein-Prettner; Chris J Harvey; Germar Pinggera; Werner Jaschke; Friedrich Aigner; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Urologic sports injuries in children.

Authors:  Nicholas R Styn; Julian Wan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Mountain biking injuries in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Kylee B Aleman; Michael C Meyers
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Lessons on Mass Gatherings Learned From the 2019 Union Cycliste Internationale Mountain Bike World Cup.

Authors:  Paul Craven; Joseph Hansroth; Kimberly D Quedado; Christopher S Goode; Shane Dragan; Aaron Monseau; Brenden Balcik; Nicholas Chill; Scott W Findley
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.