OBJECTIVE: To gain structural insights into the autoantigenic properties of GAD65 in type 1 diabetes, we analyzed experimental epitope mapping data in the context of the recently determined crystal structures of GAD65 and GAD67, to allow "molecular positioning" of epitope sites for B- and T-cell reactivity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were assembled from analysis of reported effects of mutagenesis of GAD65 on its reactivity with a panel of 11 human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), supplemented by use of recombinant Fab to cross-inhibit reactivity with GAD65 by radioimmunoprecipitation of the same mAbs. RESULTS: The COOH-terminal region on GAD65 was the major autoantigenic site. B-cell epitopes were distributed within two separate clusters around different faces of the COOH-terminal domain. Inclusion of epitope sites in the pyridoxal phosphate-and NH(2)-terminal domains was attributed to the juxtaposition of all three domains in the crystal structure. Epitope preferences of different mAbs to GAD65 aligned with different clinical expressions of type 1 diabetes. Epitopes for four of five known reactive T-cell sequences restricted by HLA DRB1*0401 were aligned to solvent-exposed regions of the GAD65 structure and colocalized within the two B-cell epitope clusters. The continuous COOH-terminal epitope region of GAD65 was structurally highly flexible and therefore differed markedly from the equivalent region of GAD67. CONCLUSIONS: Structural features could explain the differing antigenicity, and perhaps immunogenicity, of GAD65 versus GAD67. The proximity of B- and T-cell epitopes within the GAD65 structure suggests that antigen-antibody complexes may influence antigen processing by accessory cells and thereby T-cell reactivity.
OBJECTIVE: To gain structural insights into the autoantigenic properties of GAD65 in type 1 diabetes, we analyzed experimental epitope mapping data in the context of the recently determined crystal structures of GAD65 and GAD67, to allow "molecular positioning" of epitope sites for B- and T-cell reactivity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were assembled from analysis of reported effects of mutagenesis of GAD65 on its reactivity with a panel of 11 human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), supplemented by use of recombinant Fab to cross-inhibit reactivity with GAD65 by radioimmunoprecipitation of the same mAbs. RESULTS: The COOH-terminal region on GAD65 was the major autoantigenic site. B-cell epitopes were distributed within two separate clusters around different faces of the COOH-terminal domain. Inclusion of epitope sites in the pyridoxal phosphate-and NH(2)-terminal domains was attributed to the juxtaposition of all three domains in the crystal structure. Epitope preferences of different mAbs to GAD65 aligned with different clinical expressions of type 1 diabetes. Epitopes for four of five known reactive T-cell sequences restricted by HLA DRB1*0401 were aligned to solvent-exposed regions of the GAD65 structure and colocalized within the two B-cell epitope clusters. The continuous COOH-terminal epitope region of GAD65 was structurally highly flexible and therefore differed markedly from the equivalent region of GAD67. CONCLUSIONS: Structural features could explain the differing antigenicity, and perhaps immunogenicity, of GAD65 versus GAD67. The proximity of B- and T-cell epitopes within the GAD65 structure suggests that antigen-antibody complexes may influence antigen processing by accessory cells and thereby T-cell reactivity.
Authors: C S Hampe; J R Radtke; A Wester; A Carlsson; E Cedervall; B Jönsson; S A Ivarsson; H Elding Larsson; K Larsson; B Lindberg; J Neiderud; O Rolandsson; Å Lernmark Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2018-12-28 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Peter Arvan; Massimo Pietropaolo; David Ostrov; Christopher J Rhodes Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med Date: 2012-08-01 Impact factor: 6.915
Authors: Shilpa Oak; Lisa K Gilliam; Mona Landin-Olsson; Carina Törn; Ingrid Kockum; Christina R Pennington; Merrill J Rowley; Michael R Christie; J Paul Banga; Christiane S Hampe Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-03-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Bindu Jayakrishnan; David E Hoke; Christopher G Langendorf; Ashley M Buckle; Merrill J Rowley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-04-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Claude Nogues; Hervé Leh; Christopher G Langendorf; Ruby H P Law; Ashley M Buckle; Malcolm Buckle Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-08-13 Impact factor: 3.240