Literature DB >> 18184633

Variability in cytogenetic adaptive response of cultured human lymphocytes to mitomycin C, bleomycin, quinacrine dihydrochloride, Co60 gamma-rays and hyperthermia.

A P Krishnaja1, N K Sharma.   

Abstract

Adaptive response (AR) is a well-documented phenomenon by which cells or organisms exposed to low dose of a genotoxicant become less sensitive to subsequent high-dose exposure to the same or another genotoxicant. AR, if induced can modify the efficacy leading to drug or radio-resistance, during anti-neoplastic drug or radiation treatment. Contradictions exist in AR induction by different genotoxicants with respect to the biomarkers, time schedules, and inter-individual variability, reflecting the complexity of AR in eukaryotic cells. In order to further ascertain these factors, AR induced by anti-neoplastic agents mitomycin C (MMC), bleomycin (BLM) and chemosterilant quinacrine dihydrochloride was examined in different donors and time schedules using cytogenetic biomarkers chromosome aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges and micronuclei (MN). BLM- and hyperthermia (HT)-induced cross-resistance to gamma rays and MMC/BLM, respectively, was also studied. Difference between MMC- and BLM-induced protective effects in biomarkers examined in the same donors was noticed. Adaptation to BLM and HT showed cross-resistance to chromosome damage induction by gamma rays and BLM/MMC, respectively. Cell cycle analysis indicated that adaptation is not caused by change in the rate of cell proliferation after challenge dose. MN as a chromosomal biomarker in large-scale population studies on AR is advocated, based on similar AR induced in all donors by MMC/BLM and rapid assessment in binucleated cells. Influence of certain genotypes on chromosomal biomarkers used in AR studies and role of AR in radiation and chemotherapy need to be further deciphered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18184633     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gem045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  6 in total

1.  Mobile phones, non-ionizing radiofrequency fields and brain cancer: is there an adaptive response?

Authors:  Thomas J Prihoda
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Radioadaptive response in human lymphocyte cells.

Authors:  Najmeh Assadi; Ebrahim Zabihi; Meysam Khosravifarsani; Soraya Khafri; Haleh Akhavanniaki; Mehrangiz Amiri; Ali Shabestani-Monfared
Journal:  Int J Mol Cell Med       Date:  2014

3.  Adaptive response in mice exposed to 900 MHz radiofrequency fields: primary DNA damage.

Authors:  Bingcheng Jiang; Jihua Nie; Zhen Zhou; Jie Zhang; Jian Tong; Yi Cao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Protective Effect of a Polyherbal Aqueous Extract Comprised of Nigella sativa (Seeds), Hemidesmus indicus (Roots), and Smilax glabra (Rhizome) on Bleomycin Induced Cytogenetic Damage in Human Lymphocytes.

Authors:  Bandula Prasanna Galhena; S S R Samarakoon; Myrtle Ira Thabrew; Solomon F D Paul; Venkatachalam Perumal; Chinnadurai Mani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Adaptive response in human blood lymphocytes exposed to non-ionizing radiofrequency fields: resistance to ionizing radiation-induced damage.

Authors:  Anna Sannino; Olga Zeni; Stefania Romeo; Rita Massa; Giancarlo Gialanella; Gianfranco Grossi; Lorenzo Manti; Maria Rosaria Scarfì
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Treatment with 3-Aminobenzamide Negates the Radiofrequency-Induced Adaptive Response in Two Cell Models.

Authors:  Anna Sannino; Olga Zeni; Stefania Romeo; Maria Brigida Lioi; Maria Rosaria Scarfì
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.